lamlyn2012
Well-Known Member
Has anyone read the recent newspaper article about the horse, Monty, being attacked by a dog whilst out hacking. I am thinking of getting another horse after a 6 month break but articles like this really terrify me. There have been a number of attacks recently and in each case the owner of the dog always takes off without a thought for the injured party.
I know the BHS are currently compiling stats but I feel something radical needs to be done so that we can all go out into the countryside and feel safe. People are afraid to go back to these places for fear of being atacked again and that is just not fair. I think all dogs should be licenced and passported and issued with an identity number which should be prominently displayed by both dog and handler when out in public places. The number could be attached to the dogs collar but should be alot bigger than the current identity disc for ease of seeing. The handler should also wear a number. The number could then be passed to the police in the case of an incident. The police have been issued with extra guidance recently and are now taking these issues more seriously, thank god.
Does anyone have any suggestions on what to do in an attack? I have read that pepper spray is good but I don't know if it is legal in this country or where to get it from if it is.
Other suggestions are to throttle the dog (easier said than done) or gouge it's eyes out, but who could do that. As horse riders, should we be lobbying our MP for a change in dog laws to state that dogs should be on leads at ALL times when in public places. There is no point the BHS campaigning for places to ride if loose dogs are making places dangerous. Sorry to upset dog owners but the situation is now getting much worse. Did anyone hear thr Radio 2 debate last week about dogs attacking cyclists in parks, and of course children have always been a target. In my experience dog walkers are usually very arrogant and refuse to put thier dogs on leads even when asked politely. Do we want them sniffing and jumping up at us with dirty feet and when they have been licking thier bottoms- I DON'T. It appears to me that dog walkers want everywhere to themselves so they should pay for the priviledge.
I know the BHS are currently compiling stats but I feel something radical needs to be done so that we can all go out into the countryside and feel safe. People are afraid to go back to these places for fear of being atacked again and that is just not fair. I think all dogs should be licenced and passported and issued with an identity number which should be prominently displayed by both dog and handler when out in public places. The number could be attached to the dogs collar but should be alot bigger than the current identity disc for ease of seeing. The handler should also wear a number. The number could then be passed to the police in the case of an incident. The police have been issued with extra guidance recently and are now taking these issues more seriously, thank god.
Does anyone have any suggestions on what to do in an attack? I have read that pepper spray is good but I don't know if it is legal in this country or where to get it from if it is.
Other suggestions are to throttle the dog (easier said than done) or gouge it's eyes out, but who could do that. As horse riders, should we be lobbying our MP for a change in dog laws to state that dogs should be on leads at ALL times when in public places. There is no point the BHS campaigning for places to ride if loose dogs are making places dangerous. Sorry to upset dog owners but the situation is now getting much worse. Did anyone hear thr Radio 2 debate last week about dogs attacking cyclists in parks, and of course children have always been a target. In my experience dog walkers are usually very arrogant and refuse to put thier dogs on leads even when asked politely. Do we want them sniffing and jumping up at us with dirty feet and when they have been licking thier bottoms- I DON'T. It appears to me that dog walkers want everywhere to themselves so they should pay for the priviledge.