Meowy Catkin
Meow!
I was specifically talking about horses that are already signed over to a charity. So the decisions that are made by the charity (I have no doubt that there is veterinary input, but the Peel case really showed up how that can be ignored) once they have control of the animal.
Just in case anyone has forgotten about this or missed it the first time around.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...nued-claim-vet-stable-fees-months-deaths.html
... and so on.
The whole conviction of the person who starved the horses in the first place was also disappointing to say the least.
I really hope that things are improved and that this would never happen now because the fact that it happened this once was bad enough.
Just in case anyone has forgotten about this or missed it the first time around.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...nued-claim-vet-stable-fees-months-deaths.html
RSPCA shoots 11 HEALTHY horses: Charity culled 'bright, alert and responsive' animals…and continued to claim vet and stable fees months AFTER deaths
RSPCA ordered the killing of 11 healthy horses after they were rescued
Several horses were described as 'doing ok' but were still shot days later
The charity then claimed thousands of pounds for stabling expenses
1. Khoomi Diagnosis: BAR - vets' term for bright, alert, responsive'... a condition attributed to 7 of the 11 horses. Khoomi also had bad rainscald ( a skin bacteria), scabs, overgrown feet. Fate: Shot a month later
... and so on.
The whole conviction of the person who starved the horses in the first place was also disappointing to say the least.
I really hope that things are improved and that this would never happen now because the fact that it happened this once was bad enough.