YorksG
Over the hill and far awa
I have no intention of slamming the whole scientific process, but do have a problem with not comparing like with like. My own experiences of "communication", with survivors of trauma, was not based on a random meeting with them, it was within an attachment based therapeutic process, when I knew the "subject" and they knew me. To try and suggest that this can be proved or disproved by randomly describing a hundred strangers kitchen work tops, is to miss the point entirely, and frankly quite insulting to those people I have shared the experience with.It's fair to criticize scientists and other people for their narrow and dogmatic views; it's quite another thing to slam the process of science which did, after all, get to the truth of the matter eventually. If you are against the way science works (and I believe it does work!), that is a whole other discussion.
Thanks, I would be interested to see that!
I can't find my dissertation stuff with the references in it at the moment, but will dig them out later today.