Jaycee
Well-Known Member
According to my last yard owner mine were "just pets" because they didn't do a specific job!
At the previous yard I had Mollie on, I knew many of the liveries weren't ridden because their owners told me so. They hadn't been ridden for years.
fair comment, i have been asked if i ever ride mine by people who 'never see me' and it's also been insinuated that i don't visit them every day just because the farm nosey parkers haven't witnessed me being there the fact that i don't work 9-5 means i go at random times, often deliberately to avoid the nosey ones
Depends how the term pet is used. Mine are ridden but they are not my livelihood, they are my hobby. I enjoy every aspect of having horses for riding, for companionship and for the pleasure of being outdoors.
Any horse that is not owned by a professional, is surely a pet, even if the owner only wishes to keep it for as long as its healthy enough to be ridden at whatever level they choose.
Because they can afford it. Because they want to.
Because they don't have to justify to anyone else their reasons why.....
I don't think this definition qualifies horses as pets. To me, the only expectation you have of pets is companionship and something to care for and look after. If you have higher expectations of a horse, and if it doesn't meet them you will no longer be prepared to maintain its long tern upkeep costs then you can't see your horse as a pet. I think of most horses as working animals. Not working to make their owners a living, but working to earn their own feed/vet/upkeep costs. Pets don't actually have to do anything, except be there for you to enjoy being with, horses often have to perform.
Flame became a pet, kept once unrideable purely because I was attached to her and enjoyed her company and taking care of her. I think my current riding horse might get the same status one day but most of my riding horses are bought on the terms that as long as they carry my backside around they can stay. If not, they go, one way or another.