TarrSteps
Well-Known Member
I have something else to add (don't worry, my dinner is cooking so I'm going away soon ). . .
Part of teaching a horse to be ridable it sometimes letting it make the mistake. So if a young horse doesn't listen to a containing hand, say, there's nothing wrong with continuing the aid until you're at the base and letting the horse have an uncomfortable jump because of it. (Obviously at a height where the horse can cope and recover easily.)
It's quite common for people to ask, not get a reaction and then either ask something different or panic and either freeze or chuck the reins at the horse. If you watch pros school, if the horse leaps through the hand a bit say, they might very well sit up a bit in the air and keep the hand on, to remind the horse that listening is not optional. The thing is to make it "not personal" - you ride your rhythm, impulsion and stride, the horse can adapt and if it doesn't, meh, it will learn. It's amazing how many times when you do this the horse will come the next time and be much more ridable to the distance.
Similarly the HORSE should be consistent (give the aforementioned decent canter etc.) on the approach and it's not wrong to correct that, even if it doesn't make for one or two not so pretty jumps. So while the rider needs to be in change of change if change is warranted, he/she also has to be in charge of consistency. The stellar teachers mentioned above are almost always absolutely consistent to their fences (although they're not necessarily consistent the same way) and therefore easy to learn to ride.
Part of teaching a horse to be ridable it sometimes letting it make the mistake. So if a young horse doesn't listen to a containing hand, say, there's nothing wrong with continuing the aid until you're at the base and letting the horse have an uncomfortable jump because of it. (Obviously at a height where the horse can cope and recover easily.)
It's quite common for people to ask, not get a reaction and then either ask something different or panic and either freeze or chuck the reins at the horse. If you watch pros school, if the horse leaps through the hand a bit say, they might very well sit up a bit in the air and keep the hand on, to remind the horse that listening is not optional. The thing is to make it "not personal" - you ride your rhythm, impulsion and stride, the horse can adapt and if it doesn't, meh, it will learn. It's amazing how many times when you do this the horse will come the next time and be much more ridable to the distance.
Similarly the HORSE should be consistent (give the aforementioned decent canter etc.) on the approach and it's not wrong to correct that, even if it doesn't make for one or two not so pretty jumps. So while the rider needs to be in change of change if change is warranted, he/she also has to be in charge of consistency. The stellar teachers mentioned above are almost always absolutely consistent to their fences (although they're not necessarily consistent the same way) and therefore easy to learn to ride.