Ereiam_jh
Well-Known Member
I liked this one about an Ex PC flouting the Hunting Act:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/09/05/nhunter05.xml
A CPS spokesman said: "There was insufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of a conviction."
They are lying, they don't prosecute him because they know the law is absurd.
Any person can go out with a dog and break the law, the authorities will do nothing.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/09/05/nhunter05.xml
A CPS spokesman said: "There was insufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of a conviction."
They are lying, they don't prosecute him because they know the law is absurd.
Any person can go out with a dog and break the law, the authorities will do nothing.