Alec Swan
Well-Known Member
Fides, super pics. SUPER!!
Alec.
Alec.
Fides, super pics. SUPER!!
Alec.
it is not legal to hunt hare or deer at all and if you are seen out with 3 or more dogs whilst hunting you are likely to get reported and the RSPCA are pigs to deal with and a law unto themselves.
I know of no farmers who would allow an unknown pack of dogs of various breeds, a pony and unknown people to traipse across their land to play at hunting.
Sorry to disagree but the retrieval of hares that have been shot is exempt as long as the land it takes place on belongs to the hunter or the landowner has given permission.
my post should have stated 'with dogs' but didn't, the op however was talking about hunting with dogs not with guns
Sorry didn't make myself clear. The hunting of hares with dogs is legal if retrieving those that have been shot. The act does not state 'how shot' the hare needs to be or indeed when it was shot prior to hunting so in theory a hare with a bullet hole through its ear would be ok to hunt traditionally with a pack of beagles?
Sorry didn't make myself clear. The hunting of hares with dogs is legal if retrieving those that have been shot. The act does not state 'how shot' the hare needs to be or indeed when it was shot prior to hunting so in theory a hare with a bullet hole through its ear would be ok to hunt traditionally with a pack of beagles?
retrieving shot game is very far removed from hunting game with a hole in it
If we're to consider your point, should we not ask the question; "Should hares be shot, and so by run the risk of wounding"? and then should we not perhaps pose the question, "As the shooting of hares carries with it a realistic and implied risk of unacceptable wounding, wouldn't it be more humane and more ethical too, for the hare to run and either meet with a rapid demise, or escape"?
Alec.
If we're to consider your point, should we not ask the question; "Should hares be shot, and so by run the risk of wounding"? and then should we not perhaps pose the question, "As the shooting of hares carries with it a realistic and implied risk of unacceptable wounding, wouldn't it be more humane and more ethical too, for the hare to run and either meet with a rapid demise, or escape"?
Just a couple of points for you to ponder upon, should you wish!
Alec.
Alec, (question is without rancour) do you think there's an effect on the meat between the methods regarding the effect of adrenalin et al with a chase? For what it's worth I've eaten both but mainly shot hare (/my most successful hunts for hare have been with a gun).
can I answer this one too?
I have eaten many hare that have been caught by a dog and it is one of my favourite meats, tender and delicious-I tend to by pass shot game these days after cracking a tooth on some shot but never noticed a difference in taste between shot or bought down by dogs except with deer
Alec, (question is without rancour) do you think there's an effect on the meat between the methods regarding the effect of adrenalin et al with a chase? For what it's worth I've eaten both but mainly shot hare (/my most successful hunts for hare have been with a gun).
Lévrier;12620768 said:This made me laugh out loud
I have often wanted to try my greyhounds after rabbits, but sadly they show all the aptitude of a stuffed toy in finding any.....
Be grateful the keeper didn't see this! The issue of what your dog could or couldn't do in the future could quickly have become irrelevant! Dogs on leads or under control...So then?? My dog ( GSP) took off after some grouse he startled today. They were in the long grass near the footpath. Private farm land with a public footpath going through it. He returned rather quickly as he in turn got startled by a pheasant flying up in front of him. I'm assuming I'd have been in trouble with mr Farmer had we been spotted.. Could I have claimed that being a GSP he was excused from trespassing because once his nose kicks in his ears stop working ?