Huuuge horse!

kez81

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 April 2014
Messages
391
Visit site
Or how about just getting a qualified vet to look at the horse's back etc instead of a person who has no qualification to diagnose or treat?

In conjunction with a thorough vetting , I would have thought that would be obvious? Physios often pick up things missed by vets and vice versa, at that sort of price I would be wanting to cover all bases.
 

Equine_Dream

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 February 2015
Messages
973
Visit site
Im actually a little shocked at the nastiness in some of these comments. Ok so hes not perfect, doesnt mean he deserves to be written off as a "flat backed cow hocked camel" or just out and out "yuk". Maybe Im just a little sensitive but it just comes across as so shallow and cold. He seems like he has a good heart to me. Im sure he'll b3 snapped up very quickly.
 

RunToEarth

Well-Known Member
Joined
30 November 2005
Messages
18,549
Location
Lincs
Visit site
Im actually a little shocked at the nastiness in some of these comments. Ok so hes not perfect, doesnt mean he deserves to be written off as a "flat backed cow hocked camel" or just out and out "yuk". Maybe Im just a little sensitive but it just comes across as so shallow and cold. He seems like he has a good heart to me. Im sure he'll b3 snapped up very quickly.

The seller is asking for £5,500 for this animal - I'm sure people are more than entitled to comment on his bad conformation if it helps someone thinking of buying who can't see it (!). I doubt the horse will ever read these comments and as he is being sold by a dealer I doubt she minds much either - I wonder whether the price tag is purely on merit of his size? I can't see what else is going for him?
 

Equine_Dream

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 February 2015
Messages
973
Visit site
The seller is asking for £5,500 for this animal - I'm sure people are more than entitled to comment on his bad conformation if it helps someone thinking of buying who can't see it (!). I doubt the horse will ever read these comments and as he is being sold by a dealer I doubt she minds much either - I wonder whether the price tag is purely on merit of his size? I can't see what else is going for him?

Yes people are perfectly entitled to comment. Equally so am I. I have no issue with people saying he has bad conformation - its how people are saying it I find distasteful.
Also there is no need to be facetious. The comment about the horse getting offended was quite unnecessary. Also I never mentioned concern over the dealer getting offended did I?
I was simply stating that I personally found some of the comments a bit nasty. People are entitled to their view but equally so am I.
 

ester

Not slacking multitasking
Joined
31 December 2008
Messages
61,804
Location
Cambridge
Visit site
Horses do get that big but I'm unconvinced that warmbloods do :p

I also assumed he was an ungainly 4 yo but apparently not, how much :eek3:
 

_Annie_

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 August 2002
Messages
181
Visit site
I wonder if he's a polish warmblood cross rather than pure? I know Silesians can be pretty massive, a friend has a 16.3 & he's built like the proverbial outhouse - maybe he's a cross of one of those? They're still used for logging.
 

Goldenstar

Well-Known Member
Joined
28 March 2011
Messages
47,023
Visit site
Im actually a little shocked at the nastiness in some of these comments. Ok so hes not perfect, doesnt mean he deserves to be written off as a "flat backed cow hocked camel" or just out and out "yuk". Maybe Im just a little sensitive but it just comes across as so shallow and cold. He seems like he has a good heart to me. Im sure he'll b3 snapped up very quickly.

Nothing shallow about my yuk comment nothing would induce me to consider such a horse .
I think it's very sad that horses are born with poor conformation but there's no point in beating about the bush .
 

HollyWoozle

Well-Known Member
Joined
1 August 2002
Messages
3,910
Location
Beds/South Cambs
www.farandride.com
I saw this advert yesterday and am sure something isn't right behind. I feel sorry for him really, looks like a lovely, good-natured sort. From a personal point of view his conformation wouldn't necessarily put me off (if I was looking for a BFG!) but I don't think he looks comfortable and that would.

Having said that, I'm no expert at all and perhaps that's just how he is. I hope he finds a happy home whatever the case.
 

Molly'sMama

Well-Known Member
Joined
6 April 2011
Messages
548
Visit site
Horses do get that big but I'm unconvinced that warmbloods do :p

I also assumed he was an ungainly 4 yo but apparently not, how much :eek3:

I worked at a yard that had a full blooded, papered warmblood at 18.3hh, as a livery. He just kept on growing.
Poor owner had bought him at a [decent] auction as a 16hh 3 year old but he just carried on. All his tack had to be custom made, she even needed a custom mounting block!!!
 

Equine_Dream

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 February 2015
Messages
973
Visit site
Nothing shallow about my yuk comment nothing would induce me to consider such a horse .
I think it's very sad that horses are born with poor conformation but there's no point in beating about the bush .

Debatable whether it was shallow but it certainly came across as cold. Youre perfectly entitled to your view of course, but tbh this thread illustrates everything I dislike about the horsey world and think I shall bow out gracefully at this point.
 

RunToEarth

Well-Known Member
Joined
30 November 2005
Messages
18,549
Location
Lincs
Visit site
Yes people are perfectly entitled to comment. Equally so am I. I have no issue with people saying he has bad conformation - its how people are saying it I find distasteful.
Also there is no need to be facetious. The comment about the horse getting offended was quite unnecessary. Also I never mentioned concern over the dealer getting offended did I?
I was simply stating that I personally found some of the comments a bit nasty. People are entitled to their view but equally so am I.

You are being incredibly precious.
 

AdorableAlice

Well-Known Member
Joined
24 October 2011
Messages
13,109
Visit site
It was me that said flat backed etc etc, I look at a horse for what it is structurally and fail to see that a few moments of video can result in declaring it has a kind heart or is a sweet boy. I cringe when I go buying with people and they declare it has a pretty face, you don't ride it's face, it's long mane or fluffy tail.

The practicalities of keeping the coloured horse are immense and he would be a vet's worst nightmare. Personally I love a big horse and have owned a super HW show hunter who was 18h and beset with soundness problems from the age of 8, lost to colic at 13 on the operating table. I will never forget taking him in and overhearing the vets talking about the dropping and lifting him logistics, and being warned about the massive risk of raising him after surgery. He weighed just under 1000kg.

Historically heavy horses were not bred for their height, a traditional Shire was not 18h, what use is a horse of that size to a farmer logging or working in tight areas.

If a horse is correct in its conformation you will not be able to judge the height until you are right up to it.
 

fatpiggy

Well-Known Member
Joined
1 December 2006
Messages
4,593
Visit site
I was asked to exercise a 17.2hh Hannovarian with the smallest feet in existence, and not surprisingly they crumbled under his weight constantly. He was as long as you like and it was like turning an ocean liner. I'm only 5'4" and even with spurs I struggled to get his hindlegs up and under him. I have to say this chap is obliging because I doubt he could really feel the rider's leg aids since they barely clear the saddle flaps! £5.5K is a ridiculous amount for an 11 year old with no history, but perhaps they have put a premium on for the fact he is coloured :) Like an earlier poster, I noticed his right hind wasn't moving properly. Given his flat back I'd be concerned that his lower back, into the sacroiliac is in need of urgent attention and it may well have become permanently stiff. Poor boy, I suspect he could be an example of home-grown breeding with not much thought or common sense behind it. I think if he was up for £1000 he might find a tall person who is happy to plod about and admire the scenery - you would certainly be able to see over hedges on him! Oh and when I was tacking up the biggish boy, I nearly gave myself a hernia lifting his saddle completely over my head to get it up over his withers. Rugs weighed a ton too.
 

fatpiggy

Well-Known Member
Joined
1 December 2006
Messages
4,593
Visit site
Indeed, Shires and the other heavies were only bred for a relatively short time, to be mega-sized because (sadly) it was a fad to see who could breed the biggest one in Britain. WHat farmer wants a working something that is too big to get in the stable, hard to turn, hard to trace up, costs a bomb in oats and hay, keeps the farrier in cash single handed and is more likely to have problem legs? He wants something compact, sturdy, sensible and a with a good power to size ratio. Hence a shire was generally around 16 hh.
 

r.e.d

Member
Joined
18 May 2015
Messages
12
Visit site
A lot of the poorer examples of coloured Polish WB's have similar back ends I have noticed. I'm sure he will be snapped up by someone!
 

npage123

Well-Known Member
Joined
16 January 2010
Messages
1,343
Visit site
The small schooling area certainly didn't do him any favours. I hope he ends up in a loving home with someone who doesn't mind his less than perfect conformation and action, someone with deep pockets and a spacious yard.
 

rara007

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 April 2007
Messages
28,582
Location
Essex
Visit site
I worked at a yard that had a full blooded, papered warmblood at 18.3hh, as a livery. He just kept on growing.
Poor owner had bought him at a [decent] auction as a 16hh 3 year old but he just carried on. All his tack had to be custom made, she even needed a custom mounting block!!!
And think of how much bigger this chap is! (think of a 15.3 and 16.3!)
 
Top