sally2008
Well-Known Member
My farrier was due to shoe four horses at the yard today and one of the liveries rang him this morning to check what time he was coming.
He arrived on time and they were out in the field and, obviously, very wet and muddy. Quite rightly (I think) he refused to do them on the grounds that a) he wouldn't be covered by his insurance if something went wrong and he was found to be shoeing horses in that state and b) quite understandly, he doesn't want to be driving around all day in filthy wet jeans.
The liveries were very disgruntled and don't seem to understand that the issue was theirs and not his. They knew he was coming and when, so why put the horses out? I don't get it. I think it's disrespectful of them - they wouldn't put them out if the vet was coming. It won't harm them to stay in for a morning once every six weeks.
Is it just me who considers them to be in the wrong?
He arrived on time and they were out in the field and, obviously, very wet and muddy. Quite rightly (I think) he refused to do them on the grounds that a) he wouldn't be covered by his insurance if something went wrong and he was found to be shoeing horses in that state and b) quite understandly, he doesn't want to be driving around all day in filthy wet jeans.
The liveries were very disgruntled and don't seem to understand that the issue was theirs and not his. They knew he was coming and when, so why put the horses out? I don't get it. I think it's disrespectful of them - they wouldn't put them out if the vet was coming. It won't harm them to stay in for a morning once every six weeks.
Is it just me who considers them to be in the wrong?