Halfstep
Well-Known Member
I find it rather strange to think that liability under the law could be invoked in the case of advice given in good conscience on a public forum. Perhaps some of the legal people (Puppy???) could enlighten us.
For example, If I advised Henryhorn to chop off one of her horses' ears to cure sweet itch, I would not be acting in any official or authoritative form, but simply casually opining. It would be up to her whether she wanted to listen to me or to dismiss me as a nutter (lol).
Or, perhaps I could be liable due to negligence and providing misleading information, as my response was in some way "published", in so far as it was posted on a forum hosted by a media company and that gives me some duty of care as an "author". Hummm....
And what difference would it make if I gave this piece of incorrect advice to someone verbally, rather than writing it on an internet forum???
For example, If I advised Henryhorn to chop off one of her horses' ears to cure sweet itch, I would not be acting in any official or authoritative form, but simply casually opining. It would be up to her whether she wanted to listen to me or to dismiss me as a nutter (lol).
Or, perhaps I could be liable due to negligence and providing misleading information, as my response was in some way "published", in so far as it was posted on a forum hosted by a media company and that gives me some duty of care as an "author". Hummm....
And what difference would it make if I gave this piece of incorrect advice to someone verbally, rather than writing it on an internet forum???