MHOL
Well-Known Member
I have a hard time understanding owners who put their horses on loan and don't check on them at least once a week tbqh.
Yes a well known animal welfare officer attended but the horse was not down so they refused to helpI don't quite understand the writing at the bottom of the poster - were horse welfare organisations aware but refused to help?
If so I'm even more confused, as that is a seriously emaciated horse, but I have seen pictures of a very recent rescue operation where the horses weren't nearly as bad.
So why do they stand by and watch horses die in some cases, but seize others that are a long way from danger in others..?
Perhaps its time for sample loan contracts to include the clause that the loanee should send a weekly video and photo's of the horse. In these days were people carry a phone in their pocket, it would only take a few moments.
I have a hard time understanding owners who put their horses on loan and don't check on them at least once a week tbqh.
But that won't stop them taking loads of vids and photos in the first few days and then sending them weekly? unless you were there in person, you would not know they were taken on the dates that are stated. QUOTE]
If you felt you couldn't trust the loaner, then you could ask them to show todays paper in the photo, also looking at the background should give you an idea of when the photo was taken i.e. is there grass in the field/leaves on trees etc. I still think a weekly photo PLUS regular checks would be a good way of lessening any problems that may occur.
It was not the owners fault but the person who had him on loan, the lady who rescued him is in contact with the owner now and hopefully there will be a happy ending for the owner and new loaner. Yes the person who let him get in this state needs pursuing.That horse has been advertised as missing on loan for some time - two years perhaps? - so it is not the owners fault but the person who let him get into this state should be pursued.
I do hope this boy is safe now.
I had a horse on loan for 2 years and not once did the owner come and check on him. She met me twice and then I took her horse away.
Of course, I treated him as my own and loved him dearly, but I will never understand why she didn't want to come and see him.
My big horse is technically on loan to me, although the owner did write to me to make sure I understood she never wanted him back (totally fine by me I'd never give him up). He was here 3 months before she met me or visited him. In 4 1/2 years she's seen him here twice and once when we were at a competition she was at. I write a few times a year (don't have her e-mail) with photos, she does send me a Christmas card.
I genuinely think of him as mine now.
I can't understand the mentality of 'well he doesn't belong to me so I won't feed/rug/call vet/ have farrier/ worm etc. etc. I treat things I've borrowed not matter how small (pair of shoes, etc.) with more care than I treat my own stuff as it's not mine! But then I am very old fashioned sometimes !
I have a hard time understanding owners who put their horses on loan and don't check on them at least once a week tbqh.