Kenzo
Well-Known Member
50% of the time it's the sellers that are the timewasters, selling over priced horses through rose tinted glasses.
I sell a few horses and although we sell them pretty much after one or two viewings you have to understand that it is up to the buyer to decide whether they think the horse is for them.
I always say when starting a viewing if there is anything they dont like like about the horse just to say if they want to stop the viewing and I will not be offended in any way I also understand some people may not want to do this or are to shy to do so.
Some people need time to think about whether it is the right horse and some people get cold feet about choosing a horse even if it is potentially the right one.
Whatever the reason would you really want to force your horse on to someone that was not sure, as I always would take them back if it did not work out it would be a waste of time for me, but I really would not give it a second thought if they have said this.
I dont even put no time wasters on my adverts as real time wasters would not think they were and I think it can put of some nice but maybe timid buyers.
I always say when starting a viewing if there is anything they dont like like about the horse just to say if they want to stop the viewing and I will not be offended in any way I also understand some people may not want to do this or are to shy to do so.
It had started to snow and she said it was because it was blowing in her face. It was a little flurry and the head shaking was that violent she kept pulling me out of the saddle, then nearly hit me in the face as she threw it back up. Lucky I left with all my teeth intact to be honest.
Yes, and I've been to see horses where I've taken one look and said "very sorry but this horse is not for me, I won't take up any more of your time", and then you have to fight to get out of the yard because they insist that you must see it ridden/have a ride/take it on trial even though you absolutely really truly do not want it![]()
Went to view a horse about 3 weeks ago, went for a hack as the horse was in a field and not at a yard had no school. I travelled about 50 miles and rode for about 45 minutes. The horse was good in the traffic but was shaking her head very violently, so I decided she wasn't for me and told the owner so. Now me and everyone else who tried her, 3 before me are all time wasters :-(
Went to view a horse about 3 weeks ago, went for a hack as the horse was in a field and not at a yard had no school. I travelled about 50 miles and rode for about 45 minutes. The horse was good in the traffic but was shaking her head very violently, so I decided she wasn't for me and told the owner so. Now me and everyone else who tried her, 3 before me are all time wasters :-(
To me, a timewaster is someone who arranges to come view and never turns up but doesn't let you know so you stand around for ages..!
People who come and decide the horse isn't for them..? Fair enough!
Just out of curiosity: if you had to re-advertise a horse because of real time-wasters (e.g. people who made appointments to view and didn't show up, or people who agreed to buy, kept you hanging on for weeks and then changed their minds, etc, etc.) what would you put on the new ad?
Interesting thread!
Just out of curiosity: if you had to re-advertise a horse because of real time-wasters (e.g. people who made appointments to view and didn't show up, or people who agreed to buy, kept you hanging on for weeks and then changed their minds, etc, etc.) what would you put on the new ad?
While I'm sure there are many cases where 're-advertised due to time-wasters' actually just means 're-advertised due to buyers not liking horse', there must surely be at least some cases where the seller really has been mucked about, and the horse is being re-advertised through no fault of its own, or the seller's.
Just wondering what the seller should say in a new ad in these cases?
It seems that the term 'time-wasters' has been so often misused that no-one trusts it any more - can anyone suggest an alternative term or phrase that they would trust?
Interesting thread!
Just out of curiosity: if you had to re-advertise a horse because of real time-wasters (e.g. people who made appointments to view and didn't show up, or people who agreed to buy, kept you hanging on for weeks and then changed their minds, etc, etc.) what would you put on the new ad?
While I'm sure there are many cases where 're-advertised due to time-wasters' actually just means 're-advertised due to buyers not liking horse', there must surely be at least some cases where the seller really has been mucked about, and the horse is being re-advertised through no fault of its own, or the seller's.
Just wondering what the seller should say in a new ad in these cases?
It seems that the term 'time-wasters' has been so often misused that no-one trusts it any more - can anyone suggest an alternative term or phrase that they would trust?
you haven't taken the horse 'off' the market, there is no need for a new advert.