Im not against hunting but....

Ereiam_jh

Well-Known Member
Joined
22 June 2006
Messages
2,771
Location
Sunny Devon
Visit site
Asong as they were dispatched cleanly with a sharp bite to the back of the neck I can't personally see the problem. I'm not sure I'd agree with 'chavs' being killed by being slowly torn apart. I don't feel that is humane.

Mind you as for the nonces that's an entirely different matter...
 

dozzie

Well-Known Member
Joined
29 November 2006
Messages
8,670
Location
Hampshire
Visit site
In our "local" which is known for being totally politically incorrect they decided that when the olympics come to Britain we should introduce a new sport of P****y hunting.

:shocked: :shocked: :shocked:
 

custard

Well-Known Member
Joined
10 March 2007
Messages
2,925
Location
Worcestershire
Visit site
new sport of P****y hunting.

I hope this is not chasing cats, what exactly did they mean, am I being thick?

Ive got an excuse if i am got called into work last night and got to bed at 3am
 

Ereiam_jh

Well-Known Member
Joined
22 June 2006
Messages
2,771
Location
Sunny Devon
Visit site
Go out on a Saturday night in any of our towns and you will find a fair few pu**yhounds wandering the streets, hunting for pretty much any bit of fluff they can find.
 

custard

Well-Known Member
Joined
10 March 2007
Messages
2,925
Location
Worcestershire
Visit site
Go out on a Saturday night in any of our towns and you will find a fair few pu**yhounds wandering the streets, hunting for pretty much any bit of fluff they can find.

PMSL yes I thought that was what you meant but was too polite to say, ha ha!!
 

moocow

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 February 2006
Messages
2,487
Location
Leinster, Ireland
Visit site
yeah we were discussing the finer points of chav hunting the other day. decided that in compliance with the law, they could be flushed out with dogs and then shot - not to kill them (cos that would be barbaric!!) but to sterilise them to stop them breeding. there were a few people in the conversation that don't ride so we devised a kind of sterilisation from the air by chasing them with helicopters. all the little alleyways and mazes around in chav-dom could add to the challange.

Only problem is that the chavs over here all have horses - maybe it would make it more even???

Have we crossed an un-pc line????
 

endymion

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 October 2005
Messages
657
Location
Londinium
Visit site
I don't think u need to sterilise them, I think just being a chav is the best method of contraception ever invented. I mean would you....? :grin:
 

endymion

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 October 2005
Messages
657
Location
Londinium
Visit site
I'm only pompous and self-righteous when talking to members of the evil dark side.

I actually have a great sense of humour. How about this;

Q: How do you titillate an ocelot?
A:Oscillate it's tit a lot.

Feckin hilarious (if slightly disgusting) :grin: ;)
 

Ereiam_jh

Well-Known Member
Joined
22 June 2006
Messages
2,771
Location
Sunny Devon
Visit site

endymion

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 October 2005
Messages
657
Location
Londinium
Visit site
Well, it's hard for me to say because I sympathise with her in that she's passionately anti-hunt and has a hard time understanding how people can hunt. I think she just wanted to show her feelings but it came out a bit wrong really.

You've been a bit mean to her. I think you should take her out for a wee drink to apologise, u owe her one (a drink that is). :grin:
 

Ereiam_jh

Well-Known Member
Joined
22 June 2006
Messages
2,771
Location
Sunny Devon
Visit site
I've been a bit mean to her! LOL.

Don't you think that people who think that other people are sub human and should be locked up because of what they beleive are a bit warped?

I think I have a fundementally diofferent view on thse things from you Endy.

I think we should protect people's right to freedom of thought and speech. Even if I passionately disagreed with someone as Judi clearly does me, I would never label them as 'sub human' and wish them to be locked up. If I did I would regard myself as a fascist, pure and simple.

Who do you think comes closer to the Nazis in their outloook, Judi, or me?

Are you confortable with a country where people get locked up because of their beleifs?

Do you think we should have thought police?
 

endymion

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 October 2005
Messages
657
Location
Londinium
Visit site
I just think she's been a bit naive. I don't think she REALLY thinks u are a nazi or sub-human, she has just used over emotive language in error to get her point across.

I don't think either you OR Judi are anything close to a dispicable, evil regime built through years of facist dictatorism that took delight in the torture and slaughter of millions of Jews and intended to take over Europe (unless you have designs beyond chasing deer, hmmmm? Should I superimpose a 'tach on your pic and send it off to Hunt Scum Gallery? hehe).

I think people should have control of thoughts and most of the time their actions. I don't believe in banning many things but certain things are so abhorrant that there is no other course of action to take. If we did not ban certain evils people would be free to rape, murder and pillage. I'm sure you support the land laws dont you?

You make out that u are pro-absolute free choice. But you are only against the laws YOU decide are wrong.
 

Ereiam_jh

Well-Known Member
Joined
22 June 2006
Messages
2,771
Location
Sunny Devon
Visit site
"You make out that u are pro-absolute free choice."
No I don't.

"But you are only against the laws YOU decide are wrong. "
No, I'm against laws which don't make sense.

Juts to be clear, this lady writes personally to me declaring that I am sub human and she hopes I get locked up. And you think that "ve been a bit mean to her." and "she just wanted to show her feelings ".

What I find worrying and to be frank very sad isn't the absurd posturing of this ridiculous obsessed woman. It's the fact that you as a rational young man are not able to clearly state that seeing fellow members of your species who don't even kill animals as 'sub human' is wrong.

It seems blindingly obvious to me that the reason this woman wants me locked up, and it's not only her I've had a number of these letters, isn't because of anything that I do, it's because of what I say.

Our forefathers DIED for our freedom of speech and thought. We only enjoy the rights we do because people were willing to flout the law. It's not a big thing at all, but making what i do illegal is clearly wriong. You know that and i know that. Wanting me locked up for pointing that out which is all I do, is despicable.
 

endymion

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 October 2005
Messages
657
Location
Londinium
Visit site
Giles you are taking it too far, thats all I am saying.

How many times have you banded the word such as fascist, dictator ect ect around and directed them at people?

Chill out, so someone doesn't like you very much, so what? You keep on saying it's s free world, let this lady have freedom of opinion.
 

Ereiam_jh

Well-Known Member
Joined
22 June 2006
Messages
2,771
Location
Sunny Devon
Visit site
Um I think you're possibly missing the point Endy. The words JUDI used in her personal letter to me were

a) "Sub Human"
b) "Nazi"

I don't really give a [****] what she thinks. I was just interested whther you were prepared to condemn what she is saying. I'm not sure I've used the word fascist very much or dictator, probably both only when I am taking the piss and on an open forum.

If you can't see the difference between that and writing people persoinal letters effectively calling then=m a sub human Nazi then so be it.

Have you ever received hate mail? Because that is what this was no more no less. Of course as it's from some stuck up, up tight anti bitch you condone it.

And no, I wouldn't send her a personal letter calling her that.

LOL
 

endymion

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 October 2005
Messages
657
Location
Londinium
Visit site
Giles I have already said that I find the words erroneous.

Allusions to nazism, fascism, sub-humanism and the rest are offensive and wrong both when used by anti's to describe hunting or by pro's to describe anti's.

I also don't agree with hate mail and think you have a right to be a little pissed off about it. However, I think you are taking it too far.

The fact is that if you continually court publicity for whaterever reason be it anti/pro hunt or some other cause you will occasionally get these things happening.

You're a big enuff bloke to take it, no?
 

endymion

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 October 2005
Messages
657
Location
Londinium
Visit site
I think she used the words in error, they were the wrong words to use, inappropriate, offensive, over-emotive.

I do not think she is talking balls because I think the message behind it is clear, 'I do not agree with hunting, I find what you do disturbing, I find you a deeply immoral human being for doing so and i think you should be pubished for your actions.'

I've been called a hell of a lot worse names (yes, even worse than sub-human) by the hunt when out sabbing but I don't bleat on about it forever.
 

Ereiam_jh

Well-Known Member
Joined
22 June 2006
Messages
2,771
Location
Sunny Devon
Visit site
'I do not agree with hunting, I find what you do disturbing, I find you a deeply immoral human being for doing so and i think you should be pubished for your actions.'

Do you think I am deeply immoral and if so why?

Do you think I am being cruel to the deer by flushing them out by walking my dogs through a wood?
 
Top