Ereiam_jh
Well-Known Member
So do you think that because you feel someonme is irratating that is a sufficient reason to make them a criminal?
I think being irratating is our right.
I think being irratating is our right.
Im not against hunting but....
- Thread starter custard
- Start date
endymion
Well-Known Member
Did i say i thought u were a criminal?
For someone who champions frredom of thought its ironic how little you are prepared to tolerate opinions other than your own.
And i apologise for being snappy in the last post, I'm having a sh*t day.
For someone who champions frredom of thought its ironic how little you are prepared to tolerate opinions other than your own.
And i apologise for being snappy in the last post, I'm having a sh*t day.
Ereiam_jh
Well-Known Member
Oh so is flushing out deer with more than two dogs legal or not?
Is it cruel?
I thought we'd got to the point where you'd said it was annoying rather than cruel or immoral.
Do you think if you find someone immoral it gives you the right to send them hate mail?
Is it cruel?
I thought we'd got to the point where you'd said it was annoying rather than cruel or immoral.
Do you think if you find someone immoral it gives you the right to send them hate mail?
endymion
Well-Known Member
I said YOU were annoying, as a person, when you keep on grinding away at something or other that nobody really gives a toss about.
We hadn't actually discussed my opinions on your particular activities in this post, just my opinions on this woman. I won't be goaded into that old chesnut again, it's been discussed at length so if you have forgotten have a look at old posts.
I also said I don't agree with hatemail (don't you READ anything I write?).
You are the one who wants social freedom, so shut up and live with it or take thus letter to the authorities and make a formal complaint. Either way, just give it a rest mate, please.
We hadn't actually discussed my opinions on your particular activities in this post, just my opinions on this woman. I won't be goaded into that old chesnut again, it's been discussed at length so if you have forgotten have a look at old posts.
I also said I don't agree with hatemail (don't you READ anything I write?).
You are the one who wants social freedom, so shut up and live with it or take thus letter to the authorities and make a formal complaint. Either way, just give it a rest mate, please.
Ereiam_jh
Well-Known Member
"I said YOU were annoying, as a person, when you keep on grinding away at something or other that nobody really gives a toss about. "
Oh I'm sos sorry I thought you did give a toss about the Hunting Act. Judi does apparently, that's why she sends these poisionous letters.
"Either way, just give it a rest mate, please. "
But Endy, I like winding up twats, what's wrong with that?
Oh I'm sos sorry I thought you did give a toss about the Hunting Act. Judi does apparently, that's why she sends these poisionous letters.
"Either way, just give it a rest mate, please. "
But Endy, I like winding up twats, what's wrong with that?
Ereiam_jh
Well-Known Member
Oh and lol #267...
First of all you are coming down to film me chasing der with my dogs bevcause you are so outraged at the law being broken, now you don't give a toss.
You're bored by my posts but you KEEP answering them.
And now you're getting all annoyed!
lol
First of all you are coming down to film me chasing der with my dogs bevcause you are so outraged at the law being broken, now you don't give a toss.
You're bored by my posts but you KEEP answering them.
And now you're getting all annoyed!
lol
endymion
Well-Known Member
I don't give a toss about this lady's letter or what she said to you.
Why should I care what you do? You have already told me you don't harm any animals so my concern is with real hunters and not you.
I just have a childish compulsion to get the last word, it has nothing to do with replying to your posts.
Why should I care what you do? You have already told me you don't harm any animals so my concern is with real hunters and not you.
I just have a childish compulsion to get the last word, it has nothing to do with replying to your posts.
Grumpy Herbert
Well-Known Member
As well as convicted criminals, could we add Blair, Brown, Prescott and all elected criminals to the field? I veer on the side of anti, but if pro hunt brigade/ Countryside Alliance help to get this bunch of w**kers out of government I could quite easily change my mind!
Ereiam_jh
Well-Known Member
Endy you really are so completely transparent it is highly amusing.
So it's fine for me to break the hunting act then? You don't give a toss. Nor do I. Judi does but then again she is quite obviously insane. That's the point. It is perfectly OK to break the hunting act. That's a really good law then.
The only people who would defend a law that says you can only flush out deer if you shoot them are ars eholes and w ankers like Lacs, the RSPCA and the Government oh and Judi Hewitt. Any rational person can see that such a law is ludicrous and should be broken.
endymion
Well-Known Member
Well, I don't know many anti's that support Labour. I think it's a common misconception that we are Blair supporters. Most sabs I know are quite active against the war and many are active for organisations such as Amnesty Int.
I not pro-Labour but I'm also anti-Conservative. I vote SSP or Green anyway! :grin:
I not pro-Labour but I'm also anti-Conservative. I vote SSP or Green anyway! :grin:
endymion
Well-Known Member
Seriously talking to you is like having De Ja Vu!
Haven't we had this conversation like 1, 0000, 0000, 0000, 0000 times??
When you were a philiosophy student did they teach you that if you kept repeating yourself over and over again that you would win the argument (all the other participants having died of broedom)?
Can't you understand that I think there are more important issue's than you and your deer? Have fun chasing them around and harping on about your cute little crusade against the law. I have said all I have to say on it many, many times before.
I think I may have to let you have the last word on this one G, it's conversation over for me.
Haven't we had this conversation like 1, 0000, 0000, 0000, 0000 times??
When you were a philiosophy student did they teach you that if you kept repeating yourself over and over again that you would win the argument (all the other participants having died of broedom)?
Can't you understand that I think there are more important issue's than you and your deer? Have fun chasing them around and harping on about your cute little crusade against the law. I have said all I have to say on it many, many times before.
I think I may have to let you have the last word on this one G, it's conversation over for me.
Ereiam_jh
Well-Known Member
"Can't you understand that I think there are more important issue's than you and your deer? "
Very much so, Endy. That is precisely why making what I do a criminal offense is extremely stupid. No one really gives a toss what I do with the deer.
The Government and the RSPCA are about to argue before the House of Lords that they have a right to make me shoot the deer. But they don't actually beleive that. They couldn't give too hoots wether the deer live or die and nor could you. The only parties that give a damn are me and the deer, both of whom would rather that they live.
The truth is that you could not give a toss whether or not I break the Hunting Act nor could the police or the Government. There is nothing whatsoever wrong with publicly breaking the Hunting Act. Who actually gives a [****] whether the law is obeyed?
The fact is that you clearly agree with me. The reason these conversations go on so long is that you seem incapable of admitting that simple fact.
Very much so, Endy. That is precisely why making what I do a criminal offense is extremely stupid. No one really gives a toss what I do with the deer.
The Government and the RSPCA are about to argue before the House of Lords that they have a right to make me shoot the deer. But they don't actually beleive that. They couldn't give too hoots wether the deer live or die and nor could you. The only parties that give a damn are me and the deer, both of whom would rather that they live.
The truth is that you could not give a toss whether or not I break the Hunting Act nor could the police or the Government. There is nothing whatsoever wrong with publicly breaking the Hunting Act. Who actually gives a [****] whether the law is obeyed?
The fact is that you clearly agree with me. The reason these conversations go on so long is that you seem incapable of admitting that simple fact.
RugbyPete
Member
Agsin, if I can be of any service with the chavs