Ceriann
Well-Known Member
So for anyone interested vet came out to my mare with this gadget today. In summary, had her two months, shod by my farrier three weeks ago and has presented lame twice on near fore. Usual vet came out (farrier had been) last week, identified no issue in front but thought a niggle with offside hind and wanted mare in for full work up. Found another practice that does pretty much everything at your yard and they also use a lameness locator. Gadget that involves sensors being placed on poll, pelvis and right leg and it measures the impact and push up of each leg. Very sensitive for hinds - claims to identify up to 3mm variation in the hinds so can pinpoint lameness most can't see.
Vet arrived and did usual thorough check. Interestingly he had report from other vet and they had apparently noted lameness in each leg other than the one I was concerned about - definitely not mentioned during visit, in fact she commented how well she presented in front! Im definitely going to question that as just doesn't feel right.
We trotted up on a hard surface etc. To this point vet hadnt raised any issue and she seemed to present well. Gadget went on and we trotted up and down twice and got result. To the eye she again presented well but locator identified lameness in offside fore - v small niggle in near hind but discrepancy too minor to note. So we trotted up and down again twice - this time on the final turn, she started to look visibly lame. Gadget measured clear offside fore lameness. We decided to block foot and trot up again. On first trot up obvious we hadn't allowed enough time and she still looked lame but gadget noted a reduction in lameness so we waited to allow the block to work. Second time she was sound and in fact gadget recorded that she was presenting better than first trot up (where to the eye she hadn't appeared lame). So we have an identified issue with right foot - all of this in an hour and a half and I'm convinced a 'typical' home exam wouldn't have got it (as it took a number of trot ups for her to show lameness). Vet is coming out next week to action next steps - X-rays and block of coffin joint. I'm still not convinced this isn't related to shoeing (given she's presented lame twice in near fore) and vet knows that but we'll go from here.
Vet arrived and did usual thorough check. Interestingly he had report from other vet and they had apparently noted lameness in each leg other than the one I was concerned about - definitely not mentioned during visit, in fact she commented how well she presented in front! Im definitely going to question that as just doesn't feel right.
We trotted up on a hard surface etc. To this point vet hadnt raised any issue and she seemed to present well. Gadget went on and we trotted up and down twice and got result. To the eye she again presented well but locator identified lameness in offside fore - v small niggle in near hind but discrepancy too minor to note. So we trotted up and down again twice - this time on the final turn, she started to look visibly lame. Gadget measured clear offside fore lameness. We decided to block foot and trot up again. On first trot up obvious we hadn't allowed enough time and she still looked lame but gadget noted a reduction in lameness so we waited to allow the block to work. Second time she was sound and in fact gadget recorded that she was presenting better than first trot up (where to the eye she hadn't appeared lame). So we have an identified issue with right foot - all of this in an hour and a half and I'm convinced a 'typical' home exam wouldn't have got it (as it took a number of trot ups for her to show lameness). Vet is coming out next week to action next steps - X-rays and block of coffin joint. I'm still not convinced this isn't related to shoeing (given she's presented lame twice in near fore) and vet knows that but we'll go from here.