Pentium2912
Member
i am a bit stumped by my current situation and so i registered to post on this forum in the quest for other peoples opinions....
I recently purchased a horse from a dealer, although i am not sure if he would admit this now! So i went to view this mare (6 yo) and got along with her fine so i had her 2 stage vetted a few days later, i was not present at the vetting however. the vet called me up and said she had passed everything and he had also taken bloods (without my consent, and adding this extra to my bill as well! but good job really). i picked her up the next day and took her home. the day after i rode her for around 20-30 mins walk and trot and she was fine. the same the next day but added a small canter. the day after i got on her and she was pratting around so i got off of her and put her back in her stable as i was short on time, and came back to lunge her later. she had a bit of a bronk on the lunge etc but seemed fine. i assumed this was because she is a sharp mare used to being on a professional event yard and was feeling fresh as she was eventing fit, and hadnt been up to much in the past 3 days. the next morning i got on her and she felt lame so i got off of her and trotted her up. at this point the lameness was about 3 out of 10 and had a small amount of heat in one foot. i called the vet that vetted her and reported this. he advised me to get her checked by a farrier for corns. i did this and she had a small corn which the farrier sorted, he said it wasnt enough to make her lame though. i gave her a few days just on the walker before trotting her up again. she looked a little bit better, probs more a 2 now. i proceeded to continue just walker work for a couple of days. she had no heat, swelling, marks, lumps etc anywhere. i called out my local vet to her and she practically re-vetted her. she said that she couldnt find anything to suggest the lameness anywhere without further tests such as blocks etc. she advised me to get the bloods run incase she had been on bute. the vet described her as 3 10ths lame. the bloods were sent for tests and in the mean time i continued placing her on the walker as box rest was sending her bonkers! about a week later the bloods still hadnt come back and as i was taking her off the walker, for the first time she was lame in walk, i would say around a 6 10ths as she was really quite limping as i turned a small corner, but was a little bit sounder in a straight line. so i stopped walker work and she has been on box rest ever since. the bloods came back as negative so i have very little to stand on if i was to attempt to send her back. i have been reading up on this on the internet and i can send her back as not fit for purpose, however i feel that with out the bloods showing anything he will not accept her. i am gutted as i cannot afford to investigate this further and have lost a fair bit of money on a horse i cannot ride and may not be able to for quite some time. in a way i feel that i should be able to send her back as she went lame 2/3 days after purchase even though she was ridden on a surface and did very little! there is no recent heat swellings cuts etc that prove that she broke whilst in my care, therefore do i have a right to be able to send her back? the seller is aware of her lameness and has tried to suggest that it is her back. my vet is suggesting a foot abscess, however it has been 3 weeks and nothing has burst out yet.
what are people opinions? if i am honest i would rather send her back than pay to fix her as my vet feels this is an older problem. I simply cannot afford to pay the vets bills, and i didnt even have time to insure her before all this happened! its such a horrid situation and its not fair on the mare who is going stir crazy in her box and not settling very well
I recently purchased a horse from a dealer, although i am not sure if he would admit this now! So i went to view this mare (6 yo) and got along with her fine so i had her 2 stage vetted a few days later, i was not present at the vetting however. the vet called me up and said she had passed everything and he had also taken bloods (without my consent, and adding this extra to my bill as well! but good job really). i picked her up the next day and took her home. the day after i rode her for around 20-30 mins walk and trot and she was fine. the same the next day but added a small canter. the day after i got on her and she was pratting around so i got off of her and put her back in her stable as i was short on time, and came back to lunge her later. she had a bit of a bronk on the lunge etc but seemed fine. i assumed this was because she is a sharp mare used to being on a professional event yard and was feeling fresh as she was eventing fit, and hadnt been up to much in the past 3 days. the next morning i got on her and she felt lame so i got off of her and trotted her up. at this point the lameness was about 3 out of 10 and had a small amount of heat in one foot. i called the vet that vetted her and reported this. he advised me to get her checked by a farrier for corns. i did this and she had a small corn which the farrier sorted, he said it wasnt enough to make her lame though. i gave her a few days just on the walker before trotting her up again. she looked a little bit better, probs more a 2 now. i proceeded to continue just walker work for a couple of days. she had no heat, swelling, marks, lumps etc anywhere. i called out my local vet to her and she practically re-vetted her. she said that she couldnt find anything to suggest the lameness anywhere without further tests such as blocks etc. she advised me to get the bloods run incase she had been on bute. the vet described her as 3 10ths lame. the bloods were sent for tests and in the mean time i continued placing her on the walker as box rest was sending her bonkers! about a week later the bloods still hadnt come back and as i was taking her off the walker, for the first time she was lame in walk, i would say around a 6 10ths as she was really quite limping as i turned a small corner, but was a little bit sounder in a straight line. so i stopped walker work and she has been on box rest ever since. the bloods came back as negative so i have very little to stand on if i was to attempt to send her back. i have been reading up on this on the internet and i can send her back as not fit for purpose, however i feel that with out the bloods showing anything he will not accept her. i am gutted as i cannot afford to investigate this further and have lost a fair bit of money on a horse i cannot ride and may not be able to for quite some time. in a way i feel that i should be able to send her back as she went lame 2/3 days after purchase even though she was ridden on a surface and did very little! there is no recent heat swellings cuts etc that prove that she broke whilst in my care, therefore do i have a right to be able to send her back? the seller is aware of her lameness and has tried to suggest that it is her back. my vet is suggesting a foot abscess, however it has been 3 weeks and nothing has burst out yet.
what are people opinions? if i am honest i would rather send her back than pay to fix her as my vet feels this is an older problem. I simply cannot afford to pay the vets bills, and i didnt even have time to insure her before all this happened! its such a horrid situation and its not fair on the mare who is going stir crazy in her box and not settling very well