Larson Traps

Sorry - not sure why we have a double quote, but there are no legal restrictions on the way any bird in captivity - canaries, budgies, finches etc is kept in the UK other than that they should be able to stretch their wings. That is dire and does mean that under the Animal Welfare legislation, a Larson trap of a suitable size would be considered ok. I agree that confining a wild bird is cruel which is why it must be both necessary and for the shortest possible duration. Very small Larson traps should be illegal - there is no place for them at all.
Notice I said reported, not prosecuted, the laws are pretty dire in that regard.
And 100%, that tiny little prison should be illegal. I could understand the method with larger, more suitable aviaries/cages (even if I personally don't agree with it), but that tiny thing is equivalent to sticking a dog in a wire crate with a piece of A4 paper laid on top for shade and leaving it in the sun.
 
Notice I said reported, not prosecuted, the laws are pretty dire in that regard.
And 100%, that tiny little prison should be illegal. I could understand the method with larger, more suitable aviaries/cages (even if I personally don't agree with it), but that tiny thing is equivalent to sticking a dog in a wire crate with a piece of A4 paper laid on top for shade and leaving it in the sun.
I agree entirely!
 
Without looking I can't remember all the species on your list, but I do remember some game birds who may or may not have had viable long term local populations anyway especially if they had been introduced anyway for 'sporting' purposes. Locally extinct is a difficult term to get to grips with; today I heard that blackbirds in London and the south east are at risk of this because of a mosquito borne virus that hasn't previously been seen in this country. How do you want to sort that out? Aerial spraying against the mozzies?

Regardless of these arguments, those traps are inhumane, cruel and should be banned.

Both Black grouse and Grey Partridge are native species, not introduced.
 
Both Black grouse and Grey Partridge are native species, not introduced.
I stand corrected. I do still think though that there is a larger picture to be looked at. Trapping through vile, cruel methods should be stopped. Think for one minute about all the birds of prey who were native and would have preyed naturally on corvids who were persecuted to extinction nationally in some cases that are now being reintroduced.
 
Isn't that just nature, and aren't corvids wildlife? All animals have their part to play and corvids do a lot of good too. We should stop mucking about with the balance of nature, we've already done more harm than good with a lot of species.
It's not nature as our meare presence effects the numbers of corvids, they they est our rubbish till it runs out. Predator species need controlling to allow other species to exist. We exist too and as I say that effects nature, if our numbers fell dramatically to a level that meant we didn't have to grow food but could exist of what we could catch and harvest leaving nature to level out may be an option ut that's not going to happen
Presumably though, when the prey species supply ran out the predator numbers would fall (lack of food for young) so it would balance eventually.

If you stop and think nature is remarkably adept at sorting itself out, it's only when humans interfere and demonise some species while defending others that the natural balance is upset.
So we wait till all the others birds are extinct, all the waters are empty then the predators die out and then what?
I never seen anything like it here in Switzerland, it's really cruel.

I can tell you that if those cages existed, people would go and open them !

I would be the first to do it too !

Sorry but there must be other ways....
I wonder if other ways to control them are legal, options are finally limited here.
ETA larsen traps are legal and commo ly used in Sweden according to a Swedish hunting website I just checked on
 
I'm confused. The first time I ever heard about a Larsen trap was on this forum, after moving away from hill sheep farming country where everyone around me lambed outdoors. There were masses of crows/rooks which nested in the little spinneys, nobody trapped them. I would normally see them sitting on the roof of my barn every day. The occasional weak lamb or sick ewe was attacked and although it's not nice to see, it is nature. We had a ton of ground nesting birds and "ground nesting" hare, too.

So what is it that means some farmers "need" to use Larsen taps and others don't?
.
In the old days they just shot the crows .. now other means must be used - also hill farmers are generally more likely to lamb outside so natural wastage is high…
I grew up on a sheep farm and crows were shot if they started to attack sheep… it’s just more invisible than the traps and imo more humane
 
Without looking I can't remember all the species on your list, but I do remember some game birds who may or may not have had viable long term local populations anyway especially if they had been introduced anyway for 'sporting' purposes. Locally extinct is a difficult term to get to grips with; today I heard that blackbirds in London and the south east are at risk of this because of a mosquito borne virus that hasn't previously been seen in this country. How do you want to sort that out? Aerial spraying against the mozzies?

Regardless of these arguments, those traps are inhumane, cruel and should be banned.
But it isn't regardless of those arguments: the only justification for using Larsen traps is the need to protect other vulnerable species or stock. There are no other practical, legal methods of Corvid control other than the gun, which has its own limitations.
 
I stand corrected. I do still think though that there is a larger picture to be looked at. Trapping through vile, cruel methods should be stopped. Think for one minute about all the birds of prey who were native and would have preyed naturally on corvids who were persecuted to extinction nationally in some cases that are now being reintroduced.
This is interesting to me, as I haven’t seen any magpies for a while, in my garden or neighbourhood, and they were extremely numerous. Fewer crows as well, also fewer squirrels. And we now have a population of goshawks in the New Forest, I understand about 40 breeding pairs. Is there a connection I wonder.
 
Last weekend, I was pottering about indoors. Heard a massive commotion outside. Went out to look, and a pair of blackbirds were on the pergola over the pond going mad. A magpie was going in and out of the bushes, raiding their nest.

Me and the collie chased it off. It was awful hearing the blackbirds cry.

If I’d had a gun, I think I would have shot it.
 
Last weekend, I was pottering about indoors. Heard a massive commotion outside. Went out to look, and a pair of blackbirds were on the pergola over the pond going mad. A magpie was going in and out of the bushes, raiding their nest.

Me and the collie chased it off. It was awful hearing the blackbirds cry.

If I’d had a gun, I think I would have shot it.
Liked as I agree with what you did!
 
Well this has given me food for thought. I would have said I thought they should be banned a few days ago but listening to all sides I'm on the fence with the large traps and still horrified by the little one shown at the start of the thread.
This forum is very educational at times and I'm thankful for the measured debate we achieve (sometimes😉).
 
Last weekend, I was pottering about indoors. Heard a massive commotion outside. Went out to look, and a pair of blackbirds were on the pergola over the pond going mad. A magpie was going in and out of the bushes, raiding their nest.

Me and the collie chased it off. It was awful hearing the blackbirds cry.

If I’d had a gun, I think I would have shot it.
We've had this in our garden and would also chase them away if we saw, but they'll just go back when you're not there. I do sometimes have to remind myself that for a population to remain stable, the parent birds only have to raise two chicks to adulthood/reproductive age over their breeding lifetime.
 
I've been folliwing this thread with interest. I don't like the use of Larsen traps as any wild creature stuck in a trap will go through endless suffering and psychological stress as a result of capture but I also appreciate the reasons why it is used.
.
I've found this info sheet from the Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust regarding Larsen traps and stating that there must be adequate shelter. "The licences allowing use of Larsens specify that you must provide adequate food, water at all times, appropriate shelter, and a perch."

Also interesting thst Larsen traps work well with bait alone (as a way of capturing your call bird) So if that's the case why the need for a calling bird in the first place?

Also states traps must be checked at least every 24 hrs and trapped birds despatched that evening is preferable as they cannot be left until morning without food/water/perch. Birds shouldn't be despatched in sight of each other either.

I suppose it's great having this guidance, but I would have thought that it would be lost in weak dissemination and many people buying/borrowing a larson trap won't know of the legislation or guidance.

 
Last edited:
I've been folliwing this thread with interest. I don't like the use of Larsen traps as any wild creature stuck in a trap will go through endless suffering and psychological stress as a result of capture but I also appreciate the reasons why it is used.
.
I've found this info sheet from the Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust regarding Larsen traps and stating that there must be adequate shelter. "The licences allowing use of Larsens specify that you must provide adequate food, water at all times, appropriate shelter, and a perch."

Also interesting thst Larsen traps work well with bait alone (as a way of capturing your call bird) So if that's the case why the need for a calling bird in the first place?

Also states traps must be checked at least every 24 hrs and trapped birds despatched that evening is preferable as they cannot be left until morning without food/water/perch. Birds shouldn't be despatched in sight of each other either.

I suppose it's great having this guidance, but I would have thought that it would be lost in weak dissemination and many people buying/borrowing a larson trap won't know of the legislation or guidance.

Due to the intelligent nature of corvids, birds in some areas will go in for food and others will not, call birds only work for a short period if the year when birds are re establishing territories and a catch rate can be high at this time with a stranger in the camp so to speak.
I am sure some people are not aware of the legislation as with most things but I haven't spoken to anyone who uses one who isn't.
 
I've been folliwing this thread with interest. I don't like the use of Larsen traps as any wild creature stuck in a trap will go through endless suffering and psychological stress as a result of capture but I also appreciate the reasons why it is used.
.
I've found this info sheet from the Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust regarding Larsen traps and stating that there must be adequate shelter. "The licences allowing use of Larsens specify that you must provide adequate food, water at all times, appropriate shelter, and a perch."

Also interesting thst Larsen traps work well with bait alone (as a way of capturing your call bird) So if that's the case why the need for a calling bird in the first place?

Also states traps must be checked at least every 24 hrs and trapped birds despatched that evening is preferable as they cannot be left until morning without food/water/perch. Birds shouldn't be despatched in sight of each other either.

I suppose it's great having this guidance, but I would have thought that it would be lost in weak dissemination and many people buying/borrowing a larson trap won't know of the legislation or guidance.

Many people, including us will use eggs as bait and any trapped birds can be killed quickly. Call birds might be used where bait won't work but you still have nuisance birds. They can and should also be killed asap. We check our trap more than twice daily. We trap and kill probably less than 4 magpies a year - if that, but understanding that only some birds will develop nuisance habits helps to explain this. We are not reducing the wider population at all but only removing the birds, in our situation, that are attacking lambs or clearly hunting and attacking ground nesting birds on the nesting areas we are aware of. Shade, water, a perch, regular checks and a decent size trap are the only way to do this reasonably ethically.
 
When snares are still legal, I can't help feeling larsen traps are low down on the list of concerns for controlling pest species. It's intriguing when they're used and when not, and the small ones should be illegal, but snares are a lot more worrying for their potential cruelty.
.
 
When snares are still legal, I can't help feeling larsen traps are low down on the list of concerns for controlling pest species. It's intriguing when they're used and when not, and the small ones should be illegal, but snares are a lot more worrying for their potential cruelty.
.
Thankfully snares are now banned in Scotland. I hope England follow suit. (And I say this as the wife of a shepherd). Snares are beyond cruel imo.
 
When snares are still legal, I can't help feeling larsen traps are low down on the list of concerns for controlling pest species. It's intriguing when they're used and when not, and the small ones should be illegal, but snares are a lot more worrying for their potential cruelty.
.
Yes, snares are vile things. I have found some ancient rusting ones here but they haven't been used in decades on this farm.
 
Larson traps are evil. Corvids have the intellectual ability of a 5yr old child.
I rescue and rehab them here in Ireland and have a few that cannot be released for various reasons.
They are social and empathic and lovable.
Yes they predate on small birds etc. but you don't see Lions being put in Larson traps for predating on smaller prey.
They were here long before us. Typical humans.
 
Larson traps are evil. Corvids have the intellectual ability of a 5yr old child.
I rescue and rehab them here in Ireland and have a few that cannot be released for various reasons.
They are social and empathic and lovable.
Yes they predate on small birds etc. but you don't see Lions being put in Larson traps for predating on smaller prey.
They were here long before us. Typical humans.
If lions and their prey existed in the same comparable percentages to corvids and their prey you probably would see their numbers controlled in one way or another.
 
The magpies around me have massively increased in number since covid (as have jackdaw, rooks and crows), the magpies have had all the house Martin nests the last two years - I have seen them do it - they had all the swallow chicks year before last, last year two nests survived - the other swallows were cunning. We are massively down on all the tits other than long tailed tit numbers which are holding, goldfinch have actually increased - prob because there are many. many dandelions and thistles. The predation is def due to in particular the magpies which are fab in themselves but I've seen them taking the newly hatched one by one from the nests. There'll be nothing left in another couple of years because of the imbalance in corvid numbers
 
Top