FrecklesTheCat
Well-Known Member
I've been involved in a couple of discussions recently about whether to learn to ride on one horse or learn to ride on a variety of horses.
One runs a riding school, which doesn't guarantee the horse to be used in the lesson and argues that it is good for a rider to get a feel for different horses as it will help them in the long run. The other has a pony for her daughter and feels that you learn much faster when just riding one horse as you both get to know each other.
I don't consider either view to be contradictory, I can see that it would be possible for one to be slower in the short term and yet better in the long term, while the other is faster in the short term, but causes more difficulty in changing horses later. But is that a true representation? If all other things were equal (i.e. length of time riding etc.), which would you consider to be the better option and why?
One runs a riding school, which doesn't guarantee the horse to be used in the lesson and argues that it is good for a rider to get a feel for different horses as it will help them in the long run. The other has a pony for her daughter and feels that you learn much faster when just riding one horse as you both get to know each other.
I don't consider either view to be contradictory, I can see that it would be possible for one to be slower in the short term and yet better in the long term, while the other is faster in the short term, but causes more difficulty in changing horses later. But is that a true representation? If all other things were equal (i.e. length of time riding etc.), which would you consider to be the better option and why?