gunnergundog
Well-Known Member
What precisely is it that you are after?I think you guys are missing the pointI don’t think he needed to be rushed to a vet by them or treated there I just think we should’ve been notified that he was injured that’s all
Even after stating his injuries they have not said he was stressed or was unhappy and continue to state he was happy and fine While he was there
I’m not asking for them to treat him or saying they skinned his paws themselves
But he couldn’t have been happy the whole time he was there and also injured his paws stressing out so something isn’t adding up
You say the dog didn't need veterinary intervention.
You say the dog didn't require treatment by the kennels.
The timing is that the dog was only there for 48 hours. Assuming dog was totally sound and without injury when deposited (can you prove this?), it is LIKELY that it will have taken 24 hours of pacing for any abrasions to be of detriment to the dog. HOWEVER, this may well not have been apparent immediately as the dog wasn't conditioned adequately to a stay in these kennels. One might therefore say that YOU were liable for the injury due to inadequate preparation.
It is therefore reasonable to expect that any 'injury' as you label it would not be apparent until the day of collection.
You/the owner was informed upon collection.
What more do you want?