plumpie
Member
Our local council is proposing to build a children's playground on a piece of land that is directly next to a popular 'permissive horse track' on a village common.
The playground won't be fenced, as it's illegal to fence Common land. The permissive horse track will not be diverted, and riders themselves won't be able to avoid passing close to the playground, as there is an thick hedge the other side of the path. This is a circular route, so there would be no option for riders to divert to another path if they wanted to avoid the playground. There are very few off road places to ride, and this is a popular riding route.
I am worried that many riders would struggle to get their horses past a busy playground: children screaming, jumping, running, swinging climbing, sliding, etc!
I have raised my concern with the council, who seem disinterested.
I'm wondering... If theoretically, a horse was sent into a panic directly because of trying to pass a busy playground, and threw it's rider, injured itself or injured another member of the public, could the council be held liable for the accident? The council invites horses to use its permissive horse track, and the same council has decided to erect an unfenced playground right next to it, without any sort of risk assessment to assess the potential impact/risks associated with siting the two together.
The playground won't be fenced, as it's illegal to fence Common land. The permissive horse track will not be diverted, and riders themselves won't be able to avoid passing close to the playground, as there is an thick hedge the other side of the path. This is a circular route, so there would be no option for riders to divert to another path if they wanted to avoid the playground. There are very few off road places to ride, and this is a popular riding route.
I am worried that many riders would struggle to get their horses past a busy playground: children screaming, jumping, running, swinging climbing, sliding, etc!
I have raised my concern with the council, who seem disinterested.
I'm wondering... If theoretically, a horse was sent into a panic directly because of trying to pass a busy playground, and threw it's rider, injured itself or injured another member of the public, could the council be held liable for the accident? The council invites horses to use its permissive horse track, and the same council has decided to erect an unfenced playground right next to it, without any sort of risk assessment to assess the potential impact/risks associated with siting the two together.