SpruceRI
Well-Known Member
Did you read the question and answer page in this weeks H&H mag?
A horse not usually known to kick, kicked out at a horse that ran into the side of it. That horse broke the 'careering' horses' riders' leg.
The broken legged woman is now suing the other rider.
The Solicitor's response was more or less that it was the broken legged woman's fault so therefore the other rider wouldn't be liable and as the other riders horse was known NOT to be a kicker normally, then this would help her case.
So, what would happen do you think if the horse that kicked out, was known to be a kicker anyway and was trotting around minding his own business, with a red ribbon in his tail, when this other woman careered into him?
My common sense says it would still be the broken-legged woman's fault, but the law doesn't seem to work like that?!!
A horse not usually known to kick, kicked out at a horse that ran into the side of it. That horse broke the 'careering' horses' riders' leg.
The broken legged woman is now suing the other rider.
The Solicitor's response was more or less that it was the broken legged woman's fault so therefore the other rider wouldn't be liable and as the other riders horse was known NOT to be a kicker normally, then this would help her case.
So, what would happen do you think if the horse that kicked out, was known to be a kicker anyway and was trotting around minding his own business, with a red ribbon in his tail, when this other woman careered into him?
My common sense says it would still be the broken-legged woman's fault, but the law doesn't seem to work like that?!!