TGM
Well-Known Member
[ QUOTE ]
Actually as I have said already you are not forced to ride 3 times a week just take responsibility for moving your horse i.e. lunging, free schooling, go for a walk around the terrain, a really good long groom, hand grazing, ground work whatever you like to do.
[/ QUOTE ] But there are a lot of horses that actually would gain no benefit from that at all! I can guarantee you that my retired mare would be no happier for being dragged around for a walk 3 times a week when she already spends every day out in the field with her friends! Likewise, I know my riding horse who is turned away for a few months, would be no happier if I hacked her out three days a week during the winter. Again, she goes out in the field everyday, is well fed and watered and really wants no more than that!
The only way I can understand such a clause being beneficial is when you are unlucky enough to be at a yard where you are not allowed to turn out very often, or the turnout available is in very limited in tiny paddocks with no equine interaction - then such a clause is really making up for the inadequacies of the livery yard.
And as for people who say this sort of thing:
"I feel so sory for a horse on my yard as the owner never sees it"
"There is a horse on my yard that never gets ridden"
they are usually anthropomorphosising! If a horse is on full livery at a trusted yard, and get well fed, watered and has plentiful turnout with friendly equine company, he is unlikely to notice or worry about whether the 'name on the passport' turns up to see him! I know several horses in such a situation who are happier and better cared for than some horses whose owners go up and see them everyday. Likewise, the majority of horses do not care whether they are ridden or not, as long as they get plenty of turnout!
Actually as I have said already you are not forced to ride 3 times a week just take responsibility for moving your horse i.e. lunging, free schooling, go for a walk around the terrain, a really good long groom, hand grazing, ground work whatever you like to do.
[/ QUOTE ] But there are a lot of horses that actually would gain no benefit from that at all! I can guarantee you that my retired mare would be no happier for being dragged around for a walk 3 times a week when she already spends every day out in the field with her friends! Likewise, I know my riding horse who is turned away for a few months, would be no happier if I hacked her out three days a week during the winter. Again, she goes out in the field everyday, is well fed and watered and really wants no more than that!
The only way I can understand such a clause being beneficial is when you are unlucky enough to be at a yard where you are not allowed to turn out very often, or the turnout available is in very limited in tiny paddocks with no equine interaction - then such a clause is really making up for the inadequacies of the livery yard.
And as for people who say this sort of thing:
"I feel so sory for a horse on my yard as the owner never sees it"
"There is a horse on my yard that never gets ridden"
they are usually anthropomorphosising! If a horse is on full livery at a trusted yard, and get well fed, watered and has plentiful turnout with friendly equine company, he is unlikely to notice or worry about whether the 'name on the passport' turns up to see him! I know several horses in such a situation who are happier and better cared for than some horses whose owners go up and see them everyday. Likewise, the majority of horses do not care whether they are ridden or not, as long as they get plenty of turnout!