Caol Ila
Well-Known Member
A friend of mine who rides bitless entered a little unaffiliated SJ show, held at our yard. She had a mechanical hackamore with flower shanks on her horse, not that it matters. She was riding in a 50cm class. Also, not that it matters. The show organizers DQ'd her immediately, telling her that they were following BSJA rules, and as per British Showjumping regulations, the bitless bridle was not permitted. When I saw her a wee while later and she told me this, my first reaction was surprise. I thought that not only were hackamores kosher in British Showjumping, they were also kosher at FEI showjumping. I am 100% sure that I have seen GP riders using hackamores, you know, in the Olympics. However, we had a look at the rules and could find nothing expressly permitting bitless bridles (but nothing plainly prohibiting them, either). BE expressly lists hackamores as being legal to ride in for the SJ phase, but we couldn't find an equivalent BSJA rule.
Can anyone who knows more about arcane SJ rules than us direct me to something official that might help my friend argue her case with the organizers? Today is obviously water under a bridge, but when the next show rolls around, she'd really like to do her 50cm course. And maybe in a year or two, I'd like to do the same on Hermosa (might have to stick a sidepull on because the Western hackamore is definitely too out there), so I do kind of have a dog in the fight. Also, we are pretty sure they were just wrong, and it's worth pointing that out.
Can anyone who knows more about arcane SJ rules than us direct me to something official that might help my friend argue her case with the organizers? Today is obviously water under a bridge, but when the next show rolls around, she'd really like to do her 50cm course. And maybe in a year or two, I'd like to do the same on Hermosa (might have to stick a sidepull on because the Western hackamore is definitely too out there), so I do kind of have a dog in the fight. Also, we are pretty sure they were just wrong, and it's worth pointing that out.
Last edited: