scats
Well-Known Member
Our monthly energy bill came in at £800… needless to say we’ve had to really cut back on heating the house!
When you're being expected to pay £180 per week for part livery, saving on feed and shoes is inconsequential.FWIW, I almost gave up about 15 years ago due to the affordability of livery, vets bills, farrier, feed/supplements, etc. I totally changed my outlook on what horses actually needed (much of it all came from this very forum as there are knowledgable people here) and I still have them... the "traditional" way is very expensive and actually unhealthy. If you took another look at the diet, the management, and whether or not there is a real need for shoes, you might be surprised what you can save and have healthier horses to boot.
When you're being expected to pay £180 per week for part livery, saving on feed and shoes is inconsequential.
I remember reading an article that said a country's economy could be linked to the number of people for whom horse riding was a popular leisure hobby. South Korea experienced rapid economic growth and had surpassed the level needed for that, but cultural behaviours hadn't changed at the same pace, so the government began a programme to fund opportunities for people to learn to ride.
I think we're going backwards here. Horse ownership is still seen as elitist and I doubt our society would care about its demise. However, I suspect that many sports are facing the same issues. With the need to economise, sport, leisure activities and also pet ownership are becoming a luxury.
It seems a bit of a two tier system where I am. There’s the owners that are seen as “rich” and then the bin end ones that fly graze/breed anything with a pulse and will no doubt continue to collect horses because they don’t actually cost them anything to keep.I agree horses in particular are heading back to being an activity only for the very wealthy .
It is mentioned here and there that livery also needs to change if they themselves want to survive… the expectation that riders will just suck up the increasing costs. An abundance of research is making its way through on nutrition of the athlete horses, as well as the less athletic, land management research from sustainable agriculture research is also bubbling up to the surface now which can all be taken advantage of and reduce costs. For me, I see a joint responsibility to help each other out, but, what I see online is that the owners are the ones making changes and this is not quite balancing out with what yards are willing to compromise with. On that, I also think councils need to consider planning laws so that yards can make necessary changes e.g. all weather tracks so horses are not stabled 24/7 (tracks require planning); all weather shelter (more planning); irrigation (you got it); etcThat is the going rate in the SE now a lot of PT livery is over 1k. Increase in minimum wage in 2023 will push up prices.
It is mentioned here and there that livery also needs to change if they themselves want to survive… the expectation that riders will just suck up the increasing costs. An abundance of research is making its way through on nutrition of the athlete horses, as well as the less athletic, land management research from sustainable agriculture research is also bubbling up to the surface now which can all be taken advantage of and reduce costs. For me, I see a joint responsibility to help each other out, but, what I see online is that the owners are the ones making changes and this is not quite balancing out with what yards are willing to compromise with. On that, I also think councils need to consider planning laws so that yards can make necessary changes e.g. all weather tracks so horses are not stabled 24/7 (tracks require planning); all weather shelter (more planning); irrigation (you got it); etc
Something HAS to give… it IS possible if the will of everyone is the same. Reading this thread, though, makes me wonder if we are still yet 10 years behind a paradigm shift the horse world needs right now.
It is mentioned here and there that livery also needs to change if they themselves want to survive… the expectation that riders will just suck up the increasing costs. An abundance of research is making its way through on nutrition of the athlete horses, as well as the less athletic, land management research from sustainable agriculture research is also bubbling up to the surface now which can all be taken advantage of and reduce costs. For me, I see a joint responsibility to help each other out, but, what I see online is that the owners are the ones making changes and this is not quite balancing out with what yards are willing to compromise with. On that, I also think councils need to consider planning laws so that yards can make necessary changes e.g. all weather tracks so horses are not stabled 24/7 (tracks require planning); all weather shelter (more planning); irrigation (you got it); etc
Something HAS to give… it IS possible if the will of everyone is the same. Reading this thread, though, makes me wonder if we are still yet 10 years behind a paradigm shift the horse world needs right now.
Mine are at home which is great BUT my mortgage will be going up by around £700/ month when my current deal ends in April... gulp!
Shoes have been off for winter, going back on in Feb for stud holes and no horsebox outings for 8 weeks which has helped.
However I'm still planning a busy 2023 as there is no point having the horses, and spending money all year round, if we don't get to have fun in summer!
That yard sounds like heaven can I move there please?! ?against that owners are demanding more and more. They require an indoor with lights so they can ride in the evening, they require an outdoor, jumps, solarium, hot water showers that need electricity as do the lights.They need a parking area for their horse box/trailer, post and rail fencing, single turnout paddocks. All these things cost money, not only the capital costs but the maintenance as well which is continually increasing as material costs and labour costs increase. .
There is what the horse requires to live ie preferably turnout, feed and hay and then what the owner requires ie facilities. At the end of this the owner still needs to make a profit otherwise it would be pointless running their business and if that is their means of living then they need to make more to cope with their own increasing COL.
against that owners are demanding more and more. They require an indoor with lights so they can ride in the evening, they require an outdoor, jumps, solarium, hot water showers that need electricity as do the lights.They need a parking area for their horse box/trailer, post and rail fencing, single turnout paddocks. All these things cost money, not only the capital costs but the maintenance as well which is continually increasing as material costs and labour costs increase. .
There is what the horse requires to live ie preferably turnout, feed and hay and then what the owner requires ie facilities. At the end of this the owner still needs to make a profit otherwise it would be pointless running their business and if that is their means of living then they need to make more to cope with their own increasing COL.
So how do you explain the enormous amount of food and drink purchased in the super markets pre Christmas? Car parks full, shelves empty! The garden centres choc a bloc ((see when driving past, I don't enter!), local smart tack shops full of stuff I couldn't even begin to think about buying as so expensive. My friend is a delivery driver/courier and she was saying even back in November that the volume of items she had to deliver was way higher than normal........ all had to be purchased.
Yet I know that well paid, profesional, middle class people are struggling.
Don't even want to start on the prices of horses......... how can an ordinary, amateur rider, with a family, who wants to do low level RC stuff and the odd HT etc possibly afford the 8K or so needed plus all the expenses you have all mentioned for livery etc. I was able to do all the riding I ever wanted to do, including loads of competitive stuff, over the last 50 years, on two small horses who cost just about 1k between them!
Us horse owners have probably sacrificed quite a lot of other luxuries in life just to keep our horses, pay vets bills, pay feed bills etc so probably we are in the best position to weather the financial storms and not be too sad about not buying the newest phone or pair of trainers.
I think the price of horses will come right down, it's early days yet and people are still chancing their arms. Before long the market will be flooded with horses that people can no longer afford to keep, they'll end up virtually giving them away just to save themselves the livery bills.
Going rate around here is about £100-120.That is the going rate in the SE now a lot of PT livery is over 1k. Increase in minimum wage in 2023 will push up prices.
Nursery fees are optional. You get funding from 2 years old now for a certain number of hours. It must be soul destroying to pay over half your income for childcare and I think that’s one of the reasons a lot of people don’t have children. I couldn’t do it, anymore than I would pay £1k livery a month.Never mind horses, I don't know how people afford children. I have a horse and pony, fortunately I am lucky enough keep them at cheap diy grass livery, but their entire costs (including insurance, feed, vet, tack etc etc) is less than half my nephew's nursery fees. And then add the cost for feeding, clothing, and housing a child on top of that.
I guess their childcare costs will go down once he's at school, but articles from earlier this year say raising a child to age 18 costs in the region of £150-200k, or £8-11k a year. Much more than my 2 equines. And no doubt that's gone up since then! Many (most?) parents continue to fund their kids beyond age 18 too.
I could afford a child if I gave up horses and both me and OH gave up having holidays. We're both degree educated and work full time in good jobs, earning above average for our age.
So from another perspective, perhaps many people are more likely to spend significant sums of money on pets rather than having children, as in most cases this is less expensive than a child? I have a number of friends/family who 'traditionally' would have had at least one kid by now but have dogs instead.
Nephew is under 2. It's not really optional unless one of the parents wants to quit work, and even once he's two the free nursery hours only cover enough hours to work part time. So you have to consider the impact this will have on your career development and future earnings.Nursery fees are optional. You get funding from 2 years old now for a certain number of hours. It must be soul destroying to pay over half your income for childcare and I think that’s one of the reasons a lot of people don’t have children. I couldn’t do it, anymore than I would pay £1k livery a month.