Morgan Barbancon

Ample Prosecco

Still wittering on
Joined
13 October 2017
Messages
10,840
Visit site
She should be imprisoned for animal
cruelty - or at the very least banned from owning any animal for life. Vile, despicable, abuse. This is WAY beyond being ‘harsh’. Illegal treatments, illegal training methods and devices, doping, beating a horse to death. I mean FFS - what does someone have to do to actually get prosecuted or banned for life. What’s wrong with people? Urgghhh
 

Ample Prosecco

Still wittering on
Joined
13 October 2017
Messages
10,840
Visit site
Ok reading about more about this - the 18 month ban is for doping violations. These are new allegations which presumably will now be investigated. It’s not 18 months for the alleged abuses.

Maybe the fact that she got the 18 month ban emboldened the grooms to come forward about everything else x
 

ycbm

Einstein would be proud of my Insanity...
Joined
30 January 2015
Messages
58,797
Visit site
From that article.

The most disconcerting thing is to understand that in the community, this rider is known for these actions. Isn't it time that corruption, lies, and dubious support stopped in equestrian sports?

I think it's just time to stop all International horse sport if the first sentence is true. Every time we get one of these, and it's three in the last year, we get people saying "oh everyone in the sport knew about that" .
.
 

Glitter's fun

Well-Known Member
Joined
1 May 2022
Messages
3,928
Visit site
Sounds like some modern slavery going on too - theft of employees identity documents preventing them leaving the workplace - which you'd think would warrant far more severe sanctions than simply being suspended from competition

Exactly - surely a police matter?

  • "theft of employees' identity documents preventing them from leaving the workplace
  • falsification of employment contracts, delay or non-payment
  • Harassment and verbal and psychological violence
  • Mental manipulation and isolation of employees
  • Non-compliance with the Labour Code in terms of leave and working hours"
EDITED - I'm not making light of the animal cruelty but it's probably harder to get a conviction or decent sentence on that unfortunately. They did Al Capone for tax fraud in the end I believe!
 

VRIN

Well-Known Member
Joined
7 February 2008
Messages
2,566
Visit site

English translation
 

Keith_Beef

Novice equestrian, accomplished equichetrian
Joined
8 December 2017
Messages
11,863
Location
Seine et Oise, France
Visit site
Always seemed to be problematic to me, changed nationalities because she wasn't going to make the Spanish team so switched to be French. Paid her way through all the years on ready made horses.
Born in Paris to a French father and a Spanish mother, so she didn't really switch nationality, just which flag she competed under.

There's a lot more going on that we see in those articles.
For instance: https://horsesport.com/horse-news/french-dressage-rider-out-olympic-contention/

Multiple violations over a period of 12 months; she appealed to the CAS against those judgments resulting in not only the accusations being upheld but the punishment was made more severe. Since then, accusations of various breaches of employment law have surfaced and she is now going to get the book thrown at her.
 
Last edited:

YourValentine

Well-Known Member
Joined
10 February 2011
Messages
379
Visit site
Anyone found/seen any other references to this story? Apart from the drug testing issues. I'm sure there is no smoke without a fire, but that's just 1 woman's blog post...

 

Matafleur

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 October 2005
Messages
809
Location
Cotswolds
Visit site
Anyone found/seen any other references to this story? Apart from the drug testing issues. I'm sure there is no smoke without a fire, but that's just 1 woman's blog post...

I had been expecting to see a lot more circulating about this. I did a search through Facebook, Dressage Hub seem to have jumped on it but Astrid at Euro Dressage won't touch it which makes me wonder... Either there isn't sufficient evidence (yet/at all) that people feel confident in talking about it or things are not quite as they seem.

The missed drug tests have obviously been reported on but nothing else. Maybe we will see more over the coming weeks.
 

spacefaer

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 March 2009
Messages
5,831
Location
Shropshire
Visit site
On a side note, my translation says "electric collars on ticking horses" what's a ticking horse??
(Thr other mistranslations I can work out eg bellboy for groom)
 

Keith_Beef

Novice equestrian, accomplished equichetrian
Joined
8 December 2017
Messages
11,863
Location
Seine et Oise, France
Visit site
On a side note, my translation says "electric collars on ticking horses" what's a ticking horse??
(Thr other mistranslations I can work out eg bellboy for groom)
The original French is "Utilisation de colliers électriques sur les chevaux tiquant à l’appui".

The term "tic à l'appui" is described elsewhere as "un tic où le cheval attrape des objets fixes (porte de box, mangeoire, etc.) avec ses incisives et tire en arrière tout en contractant les muscles de son encolure".

That looks to me like "cribbing".
 

nikicb

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 June 2009
Messages
7,399
Location
Was Surrey, now West Berkshire
www.facebook.com
H&H have taken an interesting slant in their reporting of this..... 🤔 I guess they can only report fact, and then quote what the rider is saying, but perhaps it would have been better just to report the facts about the suspension, and leave it at that, given what else is circulating currently.


From the rider's FB page.....

 
Last edited:

nikicb

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 June 2009
Messages
7,399
Location
Was Surrey, now West Berkshire
www.facebook.com
I thought it summarised quite well why 3rd party links are necessary rather than just the H+H version of reporting

I think it stated the facts clearly, but the headline came across to me as sympathising with her. I guess it will all come out in the wash somehow, or at least I hope so. There seems to be rather a lot of evidence against her, but we aren't party to the full facts currently.
 

Ample Prosecco

Still wittering on
Joined
13 October 2017
Messages
10,840
Visit site
H & H comment on this (in the comments under the story)seems reasonable:

When the allegations made have been investigated through the proper channels, and due legal process has been completed, then we will report on the outcome, as we have done with this doping case. At the current time it would be completely inappropriate and legally unsound for us to report on the accusations beyond what we have said in this report. If this individual is found guilty of the things being claimed, then we absolutely will report that once the facts have been confirmed. We do stand up for equine welfare in all areas, regardless of who is involved, but as responsible journalists we would not report on accusations that we have not seen evidence to support. I hope that helps to explain. H&H

I read it initially when Pammy Hutton shared it. I assumed she was a credible source but I agree that wider reporting needs more than 1 person’s allegations presented with no supporting evidence.

Given the recent deletion of a thread with plenty of presented evidence and wider public interest issues, I’m surprised this one has lasted!
 

LEC

Opinions are like bum holes, everyone has one.
Joined
22 July 2005
Messages
11,259
Visit site
H & H comment on this (in the comments under the story)seems reasonable:

When the allegations made have been investigated through the proper channels, and due legal process has been completed, then we will report on the outcome, as we have done with this doping case. At the current time it would be completely inappropriate and legally unsound for us to report on the accusations beyond what we have said in this report. If this individual is found guilty of the things being claimed, then we absolutely will report that once the facts have been confirmed. We do stand up for equine welfare in all areas, regardless of who is involved, but as responsible journalists we would not report on accusations that we have not seen evidence to support. I hope that helps to explain. H&H

I read it initially when Pammy Hutton shared it. I assumed she was a credible source but I agree that wider reporting needs more than 1 person’s allegations presented with no supporting evidence.

Given the recent deletion of a thread with plenty of presented evidence and wider public interest issues, I’m surprised this one has lasted!
Why wouldn’t it? Nobody is ranting and raving about the rider, it’s all measured discussion with 3rd party links rather than questionable statements by posters. If the rider is not guilty and it’s without grounds and bearing in mind very rich then they will go after the 3rd party source linked.
 

reynold

Well-Known Member
Joined
8 August 2007
Messages
2,024
Visit site
This is going similar to Helgstrand. In that case H&H didn't report much (anything ?) until after the filmed documentaries aired on Danish TV.

I hope that in time that reporting will tell us the results of any investigation into what are serious allegations.
 
Top