toomanyhorses26
Well-Known Member
My horse had an mri yesterday and I picked up the results today and from the little I know I don't think its great news. I have a telephone consult booked with my vet tomorrow but now I have the report in my grubby little mitts I cant stop reading it.
The diagnosis has been given of
1. Bilateral mild navicular bone modelling
2.Bilateral DSIL desmitis
3.Bilateral distal DDFT damage/dorsal fibrillation
4.Bilateral mild synovitis of the DIP joints
5. Bilateral aseptic osteitis of the palmar processes of the distal phalanx
6. Bone bruise of the lateral palmar process of the distal phalanx.
It was also noted that in the left fore there are mild changes in the collateral ligaments of the DIP joint but unsure if they are clinically significant at this time.It was also noted that on the right fore the pastern axis is broken back (farrier is aware of this and has been trying to bring this more into line )
Obv the report goes into much more detail with 13 points of interest noted on the left fore and 9 noted on the right fore (right fore is noted as having limited evaluation as the left was thought to be the issue)
Obviously im gutted so much appears to be wrong but can anyone explain any of this in laymans terms ?
The diagnosis has been given of
1. Bilateral mild navicular bone modelling
2.Bilateral DSIL desmitis
3.Bilateral distal DDFT damage/dorsal fibrillation
4.Bilateral mild synovitis of the DIP joints
5. Bilateral aseptic osteitis of the palmar processes of the distal phalanx
6. Bone bruise of the lateral palmar process of the distal phalanx.
It was also noted that in the left fore there are mild changes in the collateral ligaments of the DIP joint but unsure if they are clinically significant at this time.It was also noted that on the right fore the pastern axis is broken back (farrier is aware of this and has been trying to bring this more into line )
Obv the report goes into much more detail with 13 points of interest noted on the left fore and 9 noted on the right fore (right fore is noted as having limited evaluation as the left was thought to be the issue)
Obviously im gutted so much appears to be wrong but can anyone explain any of this in laymans terms ?