__Annie__
Well-Known Member
Brief history:
Some of you may be aware that my mare has been lame since July.
The vet suspected navicular : nerve blocks, x rays (showed no change ) , circulon amounted to just under £500 which the insurance has paid less the excess
The farrier(used for past year) concluded the problem was not her feet. He made no mention of corns.
Present:
I asked another farrier for a second opinion
He found corns on each fore
So, if it turns out that the problem was corns all along and IMO these were caused by bad shoeing then should I accept the insurance company placing exclusions on her policy?
I'm thinking that if my mare had received good shoeing then she wouldn't have had the problem.
I've had her for 11 years , she's never had corns until we moved here and changed farrier.
Sorry, bit of a rant as I am fuming over this situation
Thanks for listening to my ramblings
Some of you may be aware that my mare has been lame since July.
The vet suspected navicular : nerve blocks, x rays (showed no change ) , circulon amounted to just under £500 which the insurance has paid less the excess
The farrier(used for past year) concluded the problem was not her feet. He made no mention of corns.
Present:
I asked another farrier for a second opinion
He found corns on each fore
So, if it turns out that the problem was corns all along and IMO these were caused by bad shoeing then should I accept the insurance company placing exclusions on her policy?
I'm thinking that if my mare had received good shoeing then she wouldn't have had the problem.
I've had her for 11 years , she's never had corns until we moved here and changed farrier.
Sorry, bit of a rant as I am fuming over this situation
Thanks for listening to my ramblings