devonlass
Well-Known Member
Mnay thanks again for all the replies folks,has made very interesting reading and given lot's of food for thought.
I only included that first line in the quote because it made me PMSL
Great about the submissive thing,will remove that reason from the list.
Thank you so much for the info on the coats,although in a way not what I wanted to hear,but good to have some reliable first hand experience of it.I know it sounds really shallow of me but the coat thing is almost a reson in itself for me not to neuter,setters are a lot about the looks let's be honest and the coat is a big part of it.I wouldn't not neuter if there were other good reasons to do it just because of coat,but I will confess it is up there near the top of the list for not having him chopped at present.
I don't suppose there are any remedies or products vets would be willing to administer that would help with coat issues if it was an issue post neutering?? HRT maybe??
I have absolutely no intention now or ever to breed from him.I'm sure he would make a lovely stud dog,(is a pretty good example of a setter from a good breeder),BUT it's not something I have any interest in,and the behaviour issues I can imagine I *might* get after allowing him to 'do the deed' would be enough to put me off TBH.He's a family pet,that *maybe* I would like to do a few shows with and get the kids interested etc,but that's af far as my ambitions go with him.Besides if you met him you would realise that one Alfie is quite enough on the planet,a whole litter would be unthinkable lol
I kind of know what you mean though about the type of person that thinks that way.I was watching some dog programme the other day (me or the dog or something??) and was a bloke on there with an entire husky (he was a nightmare behaviour wise and a perfect candidate for neutering IMO) and he said he hadn't had him done because he 'thought it would be nice to let him stud just the once so he knew what it was all about',I thought that sounded bonkers TBH,and was sat there shouting at the tv
Obviously I'm not breeding from mine but when I said he was submissive I only meant in the way that he should be for his type as in totally non agressive no matter what.He has a very confident and strong character (he has character by the bucket load,too much at times
),and even pretends to be brave at times lol,but in any sort of serious confrontation he will roll over so to speak (well and literally when 28kg of staffie jumped on him the other week,poor boy) and submit,can't imagine he would ever fight back or be a threat is what I meant by submissive.
That's what I love about them as well(and why I put up with them lol),can trust them 100% (and there aren't many types of dog I would say that about TBH),with kids,other animals etc,most your average setter would do would be bounce or befriend someone to death I should imagine lol
if the dog has been used for alot of matings or if the dog has had access to the outdoors once got a taste for "punanni"and will reoffend.
A dog being submissive would not be further altered by neutering thats definately a "out of the air thing".
In regard to coat types, you definately see it more in certain coat types, but mind you not all, but I notice it more in indeed maybe setter, cavaliers, retrievers (although not in the case of the example used in this post) which is a good example of (not always) erm, spaniels. More wolly coat types, and also maybe terriers coats going a good bit softer making stripping a little harder, I still strip them. Other grooms will no doubt add some. But certainly it would be due lack of hormone production.
I applaud you for thinking about the "not breeding" but not all people can help it "they see sexual organs and need to see them in use" and majority is neither necessary or responsible.
I only included that first line in the quote because it made me PMSL
Great about the submissive thing,will remove that reason from the list.
Thank you so much for the info on the coats,although in a way not what I wanted to hear,but good to have some reliable first hand experience of it.I know it sounds really shallow of me but the coat thing is almost a reson in itself for me not to neuter,setters are a lot about the looks let's be honest and the coat is a big part of it.I wouldn't not neuter if there were other good reasons to do it just because of coat,but I will confess it is up there near the top of the list for not having him chopped at present.
I don't suppose there are any remedies or products vets would be willing to administer that would help with coat issues if it was an issue post neutering?? HRT maybe??
I have absolutely no intention now or ever to breed from him.I'm sure he would make a lovely stud dog,(is a pretty good example of a setter from a good breeder),BUT it's not something I have any interest in,and the behaviour issues I can imagine I *might* get after allowing him to 'do the deed' would be enough to put me off TBH.He's a family pet,that *maybe* I would like to do a few shows with and get the kids interested etc,but that's af far as my ambitions go with him.Besides if you met him you would realise that one Alfie is quite enough on the planet,a whole litter would be unthinkable lol
I kind of know what you mean though about the type of person that thinks that way.I was watching some dog programme the other day (me or the dog or something??) and was a bloke on there with an entire husky (he was a nightmare behaviour wise and a perfect candidate for neutering IMO) and he said he hadn't had him done because he 'thought it would be nice to let him stud just the once so he knew what it was all about',I thought that sounded bonkers TBH,and was sat there shouting at the tv
Just a general observation, but why would one want to breed from a very submissive dog? Especially combined with certain other traits from the other partner in the mating.
Surely a strong/confident character is one of the most important things to think about in a breeding. JMO though.
Obviously I'm not breeding from mine but when I said he was submissive I only meant in the way that he should be for his type as in totally non agressive no matter what.He has a very confident and strong character (he has character by the bucket load,too much at times
That's what I love about them as well(and why I put up with them lol),can trust them 100% (and there aren't many types of dog I would say that about TBH),with kids,other animals etc,most your average setter would do would be bounce or befriend someone to death I should imagine lol