Pedantic
Well-Known Member
what's the answer to this sort of thing, it could have been your horse/s
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-16408702
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-16408702
I'm suprised the farmer didn't shoot the dog on sight.
I have a 3 legged sheep because some ***** of a woman couldn't control her dog and chased my boy for 10 minutes, biting him repeated times including through the knee. She scarpered, I'm left with an £800 vet bill and a sheep with a shortened life.
I think dog licences and compulsory puppy'/dog training when people get a new dog is the way forward.
That would be so hard to govern. There are so many breeders out there you wouldn't be able to track it.
Plus, just because someone takes a competance course, does not mean they will actually train the dog properly once they get it!
How do you know they are deliberately there Ibblebibble?
Our ram is up in our footpath field, he'd do some damage to a stupid dog. He's not there deliberately to annoy people - he's there to separate him from our ewes.
ban all pets and then us humans won't be inconvenienced by them!
Animals can not be expected to obey the rules 100 % of the time, even the best trained have lapses. You will never stop some idiots owning dogs and you won't stop some farmers deliberately putting excitable nosey steers in the field the bridle path runs through At least the farmer has the right to shoot the dog, i don't have the right to shoot the steers
It's simple, surely, if you are walking your dog through a field with any livestock including horses, a simple recall and you put it on a lead?!!
http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/ourwork/enjoying/countrysidecode/keepdogs.aspx
How do you know they are deliberately there Ibblebibble?
Our ram is up in our footpath field, he'd do some damage to a stupid dog. He's not there deliberately to annoy people - he's there to separate him from our ewes.
What so a farmer should lose the use of his entire field just because a bridlepath runs through it....don't be ridiculous you are not comparing like with like at all. The farmer has the right to graze THEIR animals on THEIR land. Some fool's mutts do not have the right to a self service buffet on somebody elses land
it was said tongue in cheek fact is , dogs vs livestock is a problem that will never be solved because each side always think they have more rights than the other.
Well I would say the farmer on his land with his live stock has all the rights, and the idiot dog owner has only one right to walk along the public route with the dog on a lead.
ban all pets and then us humans won't be inconvenienced by them!
Animals can not be expected to obey the rules 100 % of the time, even the best trained have lapses. You will never stop some idiots owning dogs and you won't stop some farmers deliberately putting excitable nosey steers in the field the bridle path runs through At least the farmer has the right to shoot the dog, i don't have the right to shoot the steers
Very understanding farmer, it would have been shot on sight around here.
Mine are not 100% trustworthy around livestock so they are on leads, don't see what is so hard about that.