pip6
Well-Known Member
History:
1999, injured shoulder one evening during judo training session. Still hurt like hell with no improvement 2 months later so went to gp, referred to hospital 'X' shoulder clinic.
Waited months for appointment, went, saw junior doctor (JD), no sign of consultant. No diagnosis, told to come back if not improved 3 months later. Went back, saw another JD, injected shoulder, asked to wait in lobby. Heard JD talking to consultant who suggested I was fine just had low pain threshold. JD did not agree as I hadn't even flinched in joint injection, MRI arranged, told to come back in 3 months. This was repeated several more times, each time told nothing wrong with shoulder as scan was clear. After about 18 months from injury, told would do joint decompression as joint showed signs of wear, put on waiting list. Was finally done 2 years post injury.
During op found bicep tearing through, needing repair. Put on waiting list, done year later (now 3 years post injury). Due to delay wasnhad to reattach it to another part of bone. In the anaesthetic room met consultant for FIRST time! He said something along lines of 'remember me?@, when I said no, never met you before he got very embarressed & to be frank rude blaming my memory. This is a tall foreign guy, I know I never met him before & I have sheet from first op which shows he wasn't present for it.
Anyway, shoulder starts to heal, but gets to a point & doesn't improve. Very painful, lots of sensationn issues in hand, which also goes very cold & numb when arm moved. Year of physio later, no improvement, in constant pain, very limited movement in arm. Was left handed, now had to learn to be right handed. Can't use fork in hand (still can't), can't wear normal underwear as strap falls straight off deformed shoulder. Hospital say just live with it. Got second opinion from hospital 'Y', lots of prodding, final opiinion 'you can't sue 'X', just one of those things that sometimes happens'. Hadn't ever mentioned sueing, just wanted to know what was wrong.
Ten years on, start to react to painkillers, live in new county so new gp suggests seeing specialist to see if can do anything. Find excellent consultant, am shocked at his clinic when I see him & not a JD as was always the case at 'X'. Thing is he thinks he has found problem, going to do key hole to confirm in next couple of months. If so, should be fixable. This damage isn't new, it's been there all the time.
So I've lived with the pain, deformed joint, can't eat with knife/fork etc for 13 years. My question is were 'X' negligent in their examinations (by JD's) in not finding damage that this consultant has found straight away? My life has been screwed the past 13 years, I have lost my music (not enough use of left hand), my sport (I was a, over 30's world judo champion but pain stopped me training) & given me a pretty miserable time. I have been accussed of lieing, having Parkinsons, being depressed, when in reality I was just in pain from an injury. Did I receive an appropriate level of care by only ever seeing JD's in a consultants clinic? New consultant stated in last consultation how good the clinic at 'X' is, why would he say that? Again I have never made any indications about following a legal case. His readyness to protect a colleagues back makes me suspicious.
Thoughts appreciated.
1999, injured shoulder one evening during judo training session. Still hurt like hell with no improvement 2 months later so went to gp, referred to hospital 'X' shoulder clinic.
Waited months for appointment, went, saw junior doctor (JD), no sign of consultant. No diagnosis, told to come back if not improved 3 months later. Went back, saw another JD, injected shoulder, asked to wait in lobby. Heard JD talking to consultant who suggested I was fine just had low pain threshold. JD did not agree as I hadn't even flinched in joint injection, MRI arranged, told to come back in 3 months. This was repeated several more times, each time told nothing wrong with shoulder as scan was clear. After about 18 months from injury, told would do joint decompression as joint showed signs of wear, put on waiting list. Was finally done 2 years post injury.
During op found bicep tearing through, needing repair. Put on waiting list, done year later (now 3 years post injury). Due to delay wasnhad to reattach it to another part of bone. In the anaesthetic room met consultant for FIRST time! He said something along lines of 'remember me?@, when I said no, never met you before he got very embarressed & to be frank rude blaming my memory. This is a tall foreign guy, I know I never met him before & I have sheet from first op which shows he wasn't present for it.
Anyway, shoulder starts to heal, but gets to a point & doesn't improve. Very painful, lots of sensationn issues in hand, which also goes very cold & numb when arm moved. Year of physio later, no improvement, in constant pain, very limited movement in arm. Was left handed, now had to learn to be right handed. Can't use fork in hand (still can't), can't wear normal underwear as strap falls straight off deformed shoulder. Hospital say just live with it. Got second opinion from hospital 'Y', lots of prodding, final opiinion 'you can't sue 'X', just one of those things that sometimes happens'. Hadn't ever mentioned sueing, just wanted to know what was wrong.
Ten years on, start to react to painkillers, live in new county so new gp suggests seeing specialist to see if can do anything. Find excellent consultant, am shocked at his clinic when I see him & not a JD as was always the case at 'X'. Thing is he thinks he has found problem, going to do key hole to confirm in next couple of months. If so, should be fixable. This damage isn't new, it's been there all the time.
So I've lived with the pain, deformed joint, can't eat with knife/fork etc for 13 years. My question is were 'X' negligent in their examinations (by JD's) in not finding damage that this consultant has found straight away? My life has been screwed the past 13 years, I have lost my music (not enough use of left hand), my sport (I was a, over 30's world judo champion but pain stopped me training) & given me a pretty miserable time. I have been accussed of lieing, having Parkinsons, being depressed, when in reality I was just in pain from an injury. Did I receive an appropriate level of care by only ever seeing JD's in a consultants clinic? New consultant stated in last consultation how good the clinic at 'X' is, why would he say that? Again I have never made any indications about following a legal case. His readyness to protect a colleagues back makes me suspicious.
Thoughts appreciated.