Kenzo
Well-Known Member
Yes we have had another debate in our office today, this time its about the GN, not the usual ''its cruel'' but this time about why the winners are never ridden by women jockeys.
Apparently is because women are not strong enough, nor do they have the guts or the stamina and has nothing to do with being sexist, they are not asked to ride the runners with a half a chance winning because the horse requires a man to get it round, of course my reply was that women do ride in the National however there are less women jockey's therefore obviously fewer selection of talented women riders to choose from but I was fighting a loosing battle.
I don't think they were being sexist, they truly believe a woman is just not cut out for the ride over National fences and therefore would reduce the chances of the horse getting placed if taken round by a woman jockey.
So folks, what do you think?
Apparently is because women are not strong enough, nor do they have the guts or the stamina and has nothing to do with being sexist, they are not asked to ride the runners with a half a chance winning because the horse requires a man to get it round, of course my reply was that women do ride in the National however there are less women jockey's therefore obviously fewer selection of talented women riders to choose from but I was fighting a loosing battle.
I don't think they were being sexist, they truly believe a woman is just not cut out for the ride over National fences and therefore would reduce the chances of the horse getting placed if taken round by a woman jockey.
So folks, what do you think?