Yes I think it should have got higher especially when it produced some of the best shoulder in and some very good flying changes yet was only getting 7's and 8's.
[ QUOTE ]
Not to be too political but if that had been an American rider there would have been a few 9s in there for her shoulder-ins and extended canter
[ QUOTE ]
Not to be too political but if that had been an American rider there would have been a few 9s in there for her shoulder-ins and extended canter
[/ QUOTE ]
I am with you on that one.
I can not understand the markings from the judges. We are either watching completely different tests or there is a little nepotism going on here.
The American lady riders were, lets just say, not that polished in their riding. All over the place in fact. Yet the Americans all seem to be getting 9's and generous all round scores.
[ QUOTE ]
Not to be too political but if that had been an American rider there would have been a few 9s in there for her shoulder-ins and extended canter
[/ QUOTE ]
Absolutely, I think the judges have their star-spangled glasses on
very dodgy judging, Tina's should have been mid-30s imho.
also can't believe that Alex's test only got 1 mark lower than WFP's... very perplexing.
Megan Jones' test was very good, deserved such a good mark imho.