poacher82
Well-Known Member
Have read with interest the thread on Pateys, following the HH letter in this weeks' issue about BD's ruling.
Here's another ponderance on the subject of hats: should there be a ruling that if you fall off at a competition and your hat hits the ground, you have to surrender it to the officials? I.e. it is ensured that you replace it with a new one.
We all know hats protect your brains by sacrificing themselves - the foam lining compresses to take the impact, thereby cushioning said skull/brains. But equally I'm sure the majority of us wince at the cost of a new helmet, and may well think twice after a 'small' fall, a 'slow' fall, a 'gentle' fall. For e.g. I fell off on a surface recently, landed on my bum but head thumped the floor. I did buy a new hat, because frankly I was a bit woozy and within 10 mins of hitting the deck had texted a friend who worked for my fav hat manufacturer to place a friends and family discount. However, had I left it until later, I may well have 'rationalised' that the woodchip was pretty soft, my head was the secondary impact, etc etc, and not replaced it. Let's face it, it made a £12 SJ round considerably dearer. I know plenty of people who ride in hats several years old that have hit the deck numerous times, and they won't replace them by choice.
Would this be policing gone mad, or would it be a sensible idea that would genuinely help improve safety?
On another slight tangent, I never fail to be amazed that BE don't change hat tag colours on a season by season basis so that at least hats are checked annually for obvious signs of decay.
Sorry, essay over, but curious to hear other's thoughts on the subject of replacing damaged hats...
Here's another ponderance on the subject of hats: should there be a ruling that if you fall off at a competition and your hat hits the ground, you have to surrender it to the officials? I.e. it is ensured that you replace it with a new one.
We all know hats protect your brains by sacrificing themselves - the foam lining compresses to take the impact, thereby cushioning said skull/brains. But equally I'm sure the majority of us wince at the cost of a new helmet, and may well think twice after a 'small' fall, a 'slow' fall, a 'gentle' fall. For e.g. I fell off on a surface recently, landed on my bum but head thumped the floor. I did buy a new hat, because frankly I was a bit woozy and within 10 mins of hitting the deck had texted a friend who worked for my fav hat manufacturer to place a friends and family discount. However, had I left it until later, I may well have 'rationalised' that the woodchip was pretty soft, my head was the secondary impact, etc etc, and not replaced it. Let's face it, it made a £12 SJ round considerably dearer. I know plenty of people who ride in hats several years old that have hit the deck numerous times, and they won't replace them by choice.
Would this be policing gone mad, or would it be a sensible idea that would genuinely help improve safety?
On another slight tangent, I never fail to be amazed that BE don't change hat tag colours on a season by season basis so that at least hats are checked annually for obvious signs of decay.
Sorry, essay over, but curious to hear other's thoughts on the subject of replacing damaged hats...