Only lame in trot

Identityincrisis

Well-Known Member
Joined
10 November 2011
Messages
1,643
Visit site
I was recently talking to an acquaintance about her horse. She told me he is now just a happy hacker as he had back issues which have been resolved with injections but he is still lame in trot, therefore she only walks and canters.

Am i wrong in thinking the horse is lame, whether that is in 1 gait or all 4? I wouldn't be comfortable riding the horse if he was lame in 1 gait but just miss that one out! I was just confused by the statement
 
Last edited:

Orangehorse

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 November 2005
Messages
13,654
Visit site
Depends on what the vet has said. It might be considered OK to keep it in gentle work.

That is what everyone says about mine, no he probably isn't sound in trot if not on medication, but he walks fast and is ready for a canter if offered.
 

AShetlandBitMeOnce

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 January 2015
Messages
6,358
Visit site
I would imagine the horse is lame in all gaits to some extent, it's just not as obvious as it is when the horse is trotting. Pain is pain.
I would keep a low level arthritic in gentle work, or a mechanical lameness depending on it's degree. But it sounds like your friend is doing that typical horse owner thing you see where they persuade themselves that what they are doing is okay because it suits what they want rather than what's best for the horse. I see it all the time.
 
Last edited:

Bellaboo18

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 October 2018
Messages
2,520
Visit site
Depends on what the vet has said. It might be considered OK to keep it in gentle work.

That is what everyone says about mine, no he probably isn't sound in trot if not on medication, but he walks fast and is ready for a canter if offered.
I'd be querying the fast walk tbh.
 

Sprogladite01

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 September 2019
Messages
376
Visit site
For me lame = lame, regardless of pace. And if the horse is lame, it's likely in pain, so I'd be against keeping in work til cause was determined and treated appropriately. If still lame after treatment then it's a no go for riding, however good it looked in other paces. If the horse is still lame in trot how does she know the back issues have been resolved?

I think there are a lot of people (myself included, and some vets included) who struggle to see lameness, both generally and in paces that aren't trot
 

poiuytrewq

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 April 2008
Messages
19,324
Location
Cotswolds
Visit site
?‍♀️ Someone I know who’s horse is definitely lame to a varying degree behind but often a good 5/10 insists it’s absolutely fine because it’s only lame in the school, it canters across the field when turned out fine. Therefore is fine to ride
 

Mrs. Jingle

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 September 2009
Messages
5,617
Location
Deep in Bandit Country
Visit site
Gosh going by that then I could still be hacking out my lovely old mare when my other hip is done. She gallops around the field like a two year old some days, at recent yearly vet check she comes up as very, very slightly iffy on a small circle in trot, but appears sound in walk. As my vet said, if we didn't know what we know, you could almost call her sound...on that day......almost.

I would love to still be able to ride her when I am fit again, she would be a perfect hack for me. But I damn well wouldn't. Unsound is unsound, there is no such thing IMO as a little bit lame in any pace, they are lame or they are sound and thats it.
 

poiuytrewq

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 April 2008
Messages
19,324
Location
Cotswolds
Visit site
I’ve recently, after a lot of investigation stopped riding my horse. He’s going for a long holiday and if no change then is permanently retired or pts.
The amount of times I’m told “he’s fine to hack” or people hunt worse is unbelievably sad.
I think it seems pretty acceptable to people these days.
 
Joined
30 January 2022
Messages
119
Visit site
Lame in trot is lame full stop. We have a stupid Australian woman on my yard who insists her horse is 'lame in trot' granted she doesn't try to ride her then. She claims there is always something wrong with her horse, but that's another story. My point was Lame is Lame.
 

Birker2020

Well-Known Member
Joined
18 January 2021
Messages
10,549
Location
West Mids
Visit site
I was recently talking to an acquaintance about her horse. She told me he is now just a happy hacker as he had back issues which have been resolved with injections but he is still lame in trot, therefore she only walks and canters.

Am i wrong in thinking the horse is lame, whether that is in 1 gait or all 4? I wouldn't be comfortable riding the horse if he was lame in 1 gait but just miss that one out! I was just confused by the statement
Trot uses a different muscle group than walk or canter and its more obvious to the vet, you can also do flexion tests of trot whereas you can't from canter.
 

JGC

Well-Known Member
Joined
16 September 2011
Messages
2,498
Location
France
Visit site
The number of times liveries on the yard have said "but they weren't lame in walk!" as a kind of "oh it can't be that bad" and I've had to grit my teeth, take a deep and explain as politely as possible ...
 

eggs

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 February 2009
Messages
5,364
Visit site
Lameness is much easier to see in tort especially to the untrained eye. However the horse is still lame even if the owner cannot recognise it.
 
Top