Elsbells
Well-Known Member
She looks nice - but definitely not sound behind.
Agree with this.
She looks nice - but definitely not sound behind.
Agree with this.
Just out of interest you dont think its to do with her being a trotter does it? I know someone mentioned before it could have something to do with why her movement may look a little funny and unsound... xx
Well you all going to think I'm mad but I brought her in for another play popped a saddle on and backed her.. loosely using the word. I got on and we walked around garden in floodlight, never been sat on and not a flinch Oooo so so tempted!!! Lol
I dont think that they prove anything, at worse they can make a small problem a bigger problem, I think that they are an out dated method of testing a horses soundness. With a FT you are ostensibly making a horse lame for at least 2 or 3 strides. In most cases, including this filly, it is obvious that there is a problem so why confirm it with a FT.
No I didnt make her lame... but i wasnt sure about her soundness behind hence why I did the flexion test.
Why dont you like flexion tests and why not in youngsters?