ex racer rider
Well-Known Member
Dont shoot me down, I have the up most respect for all of the Paralympic (and Olympic) athletes so this is in no way shape of form an anti-disability post.
After watching some of Sophie Christiansens dressage test (it was just recapped on channel 4) I noticed she was wearing spurs. Surely she shouldnt be? It is drummed into us 'spurs are ONLY for secure lower legs' yet she obviously suffers from a disability that affects her muscle control (I dont really know her story) I noticed her legs were convulsing and she had spurs on ultimately jabbing the horse... tbh it didnt look like it was bothered so she obviously wasnt causing pain (the Olympic horses showed more distress, kittle springs to mind)
But I just thought hmmm, should she really be wearing spurs?
(I really hope this hasnt come across as mean or nasty, I honestly dont mean it that way if it does appear that way)
After watching some of Sophie Christiansens dressage test (it was just recapped on channel 4) I noticed she was wearing spurs. Surely she shouldnt be? It is drummed into us 'spurs are ONLY for secure lower legs' yet she obviously suffers from a disability that affects her muscle control (I dont really know her story) I noticed her legs were convulsing and she had spurs on ultimately jabbing the horse... tbh it didnt look like it was bothered so she obviously wasnt causing pain (the Olympic horses showed more distress, kittle springs to mind)
But I just thought hmmm, should she really be wearing spurs?
(I really hope this hasnt come across as mean or nasty, I honestly dont mean it that way if it does appear that way)