AengusOg
Well-Known Member
[ QUOTE ]
Genuine question - if you don't increase pressure what do you do instead? That is always what I was taught, even as a kid on a pony, squeeze, kick, use stick to back up your leg. Same with halting etc using your seat before your hand. I'm a bit confused
[/ QUOTE ]
Don't worry, there are lots of confused people about.
I'm confused about why anyone would advocate presenting a horse with a cue and, when he fails to give the desired response, changing that cue and introducing an escalation of pressure in the hope that that may help him understand what is required of him.
If a horse is trained to be compliant and responsive, by consistent pressure, by repetition, and without the use of fear, he will always be willing to offer something in response to a cue. If he is given the chance to try, without reprimand if he gets it wrong, and praised when he gets it right, he shouldn't need any escalation of pressure, such as boots in the ribs and whips.
The Parelli student presents the green horse with a waggling finger as a cue for him to back up. When he fails to understand, he is presented with a moving rope. If he still doesn't understand, the rope is wiggled more violently in the hope that he may work out from that what is actually required of him.
What can and does happen is that the horse gets tense, agitated, and confused and, because he can't gain relief from the cues, he throws his head about and may rear, or attempts to barge froward. This results in the (temporary) cessation of the cues, and the horse has learned that to exhibit resistance gets him some relief. He hasn't learned to back up in a controlled and relaxed manner, that's for sure.
Horses which require escalation of pressure haven't been given the opportunity to properly learn how to respond to simple cues, and gentle pressure.
Genuine question - if you don't increase pressure what do you do instead? That is always what I was taught, even as a kid on a pony, squeeze, kick, use stick to back up your leg. Same with halting etc using your seat before your hand. I'm a bit confused
[/ QUOTE ]
Don't worry, there are lots of confused people about.
I'm confused about why anyone would advocate presenting a horse with a cue and, when he fails to give the desired response, changing that cue and introducing an escalation of pressure in the hope that that may help him understand what is required of him.
If a horse is trained to be compliant and responsive, by consistent pressure, by repetition, and without the use of fear, he will always be willing to offer something in response to a cue. If he is given the chance to try, without reprimand if he gets it wrong, and praised when he gets it right, he shouldn't need any escalation of pressure, such as boots in the ribs and whips.
The Parelli student presents the green horse with a waggling finger as a cue for him to back up. When he fails to understand, he is presented with a moving rope. If he still doesn't understand, the rope is wiggled more violently in the hope that he may work out from that what is actually required of him.
What can and does happen is that the horse gets tense, agitated, and confused and, because he can't gain relief from the cues, he throws his head about and may rear, or attempts to barge froward. This results in the (temporary) cessation of the cues, and the horse has learned that to exhibit resistance gets him some relief. He hasn't learned to back up in a controlled and relaxed manner, that's for sure.
Horses which require escalation of pressure haven't been given the opportunity to properly learn how to respond to simple cues, and gentle pressure.