Natch
Well-Known Member
Whilst I don't disagree about the wastage in racing, it is NOT the only culprit.
I agree
Racing is totally transparent - every mare covered is recorded, every foal born is registered and microchipped, and their career is reported right up until they come out of training.
and yet there is still the problem of wastage. Is the record keeping really helping them to waste less horses?
That doesn't happen with ANY other section of the horse world. Until the same records are available for every horse, it is wrong to lay the blame for the malaise of the horse industry at racing's door. Racing is not alone in confining horses to stables without turnout - nor chucking them out when they are unwanted.
Not at all, but I don't believe that any other single sector sends as many horses to slaughter
That said, I would dearly like to see the BHA take a more active part in what happens to horses after racing, as I would every competitive body.
I don't understand why there are no outcries about what happens to dressage horses that are no good, or showjumpers, or the older horse whose rider aspires to more than that horse can now give. And make no mistake, this forum and HHO adverts are riddled with people selling on horses for those reasons. Yet these very same are those that are outraged about how dreadful racing is.
I can only be outraged at one thing at a time
It's very easy to lay blame when there are statisitics to work from, as in racing. But it is very wrong when other sections of the horse world who have never recorded their breeding or performance figures then escape scrutiny or a call to step up to the mark welfare wise.
Agree completely.
As this thread is about slaughter, but seemingly having the TB industry take the flak, I'd like to show how the rest of the equine population has to be considered equally culpable.
From a BHA report - In 2006, out of the 7,590 horses taken out of training, this is what happened to them;
Exported 1168
Racing in IRE & C. Islands 209
Point to Point (GB) 703
Point to Point (IRE) 40
Sport Horse/Recreation 582
Retired to Stud 1446
Reported Dead 852
Whereabouts Unknown 2404
Sold at Auction - no further records 186
So, from this, the max number (by adding the last three in the column) that could have gone for slaughter is 3,442. The likelihood is much lower, however, as the 'reported dead' will include horses that have died on the track, or on the gallops, or from colic, or been PTS for injury.
The whereabouts 'unknown' is exactly that - and could well include a lot of horses that are just given to good homes. I've had 2 TBs that fit that bill, and they were never a slaughter statistic.
Given that the year this report was published, over 20,000 horses were slaughtered in the UK, I hope it puts racing more into perspective.
Interesting reading. I pick out the racing industry because I percieve them to have the highest % of wastage of any equine sport. I also think that if we can change racing, other sectors are more likely to sit up and take notice, whereas if we tackled the overpopulation of native ponies on the hills and commons first, I don't think it would have the equivalent effect on racing. Of course this is very simplistic and what is really needed is for every source to be tackled simultaneously, which I think in all fairness some sectors are doing.