Tnavas
Well-Known Member
Tnavas, what's wrong with double joined bits? They've been around at least fifty years, afaik, and a lot of horses prefer them to a single joint. Why do you include them in a list of things that prove that a horse is resisting?
The plain french link has been around a lot longer than 50 years but was rarely used. 99% of horses were ridden in an eggbut snaffle - In the mid 70's the 'Loose ring German Hollow mouth' was the bit in fashion. The early French links had a far shorter centre plate - most often it was two small rings joined together. If you look the skeleton of the lower jar the two jaw bones that make up the bars are at the most 1" apart, while the double jointed bit reduces stops the nutcracker action it now places the joints over the top of the bars, causing bruising and in some cases breaking the skin on the sides of the mouth - see photo below. The nutcracker action is not as harsh as some have tried to make it be - its action limited by the width of the upper jaw, and also the placing of the horses head. I've never found I've needed anything other than a single jointed bit, despite the hundreds of horses that I've schooled. I bring all mine on in a Fulmer & drop - including the TB's off the track who usually need re mouthing, they then go into a single jointed eggbutt snaffle and cavesson noseband.