TrasaM
Well-Known Member
On the 4th of September at approximately 8 pm my friend's horse BB was shot. It was an awful decision to have to make. He was just 7 years old. He'd had an ongoing problem with his stifle locking and recurrent lameness for the past 18 months. He was nerve blocked in late spring and the vet could not find any problem other than the left stifle so friend was advised to bute and rest then return to work gradually. It had been the same advice the year before with always the same advice. In August I filmed him being ridden and he was horribly lame so it was agreed that he would go to Newmarket for a full diagnostics. It was pre agreed with the insurers that they would pay for the diagnostis but they would not pay for any treatment to his left stifle as time had expired on this as vet had diagnosed it earlier. So diagnostics were done and it was found that because of the stifle problem he'd chNged how he used his legs and bony growths had developed on both stifles. He also had three areas of kissing spine and changes had occurred to his front feet. Insurer refused to pay saying that all issues were due to the initial problem so therefore not a new condition. After much debate and 5/7 vet opinion that surgery was not a good option and he should be euthanised to save any further pain, my friend decided that this was what she must do. We bought him home and on the day he was due to be shot Insurer phoned to say that they were one NOT paying for anything .. Diagnostics, euthanasia or loss of use and denied that they'd agreed both verbally and in writing to do so. I've seen the letter and they left themselves a very wide exemption clause that you could drive a HGV through. This on too of the awful decision to have him pts has taken a terrible toll in my friend. She can't afford to pay the vets and the bill exceeds £3k not to mention the other costs, transport and knacker man, she's since had to fork out for.
I know I'm not allowed to mention the insurers name on here but they are very well known and not some cheap option. My OH has helped draft a letter to them and friend is contacting the ombudsman for help.
On a personal level this is a horse who I rode regularly and loved. I've never seen a horse pts before and whilst impressed about the speed and efficiency of the knackerman, seeing him lying dead in his paddock was just awful.
We are angry and upset .. Where exactly is the point of insurance when they can try to wiggle out of their obligation like this. Meanwhile local vets are " extremely sorry for the outcome and feel responsible" Yes they bloody should.. Had it been an option to leave his corpse at there gateway with a sign saying Horse owners Beware this Vets, we'd have done so. T
Thank you for reading and am happy to mention the insurer to anyone who asks.
I know I'm not allowed to mention the insurers name on here but they are very well known and not some cheap option. My OH has helped draft a letter to them and friend is contacting the ombudsman for help.
On a personal level this is a horse who I rode regularly and loved. I've never seen a horse pts before and whilst impressed about the speed and efficiency of the knackerman, seeing him lying dead in his paddock was just awful.
We are angry and upset .. Where exactly is the point of insurance when they can try to wiggle out of their obligation like this. Meanwhile local vets are " extremely sorry for the outcome and feel responsible" Yes they bloody should.. Had it been an option to leave his corpse at there gateway with a sign saying Horse owners Beware this Vets, we'd have done so. T
Thank you for reading and am happy to mention the insurer to anyone who asks.