charlie76
Well-Known Member
Friend of mine sold a horse about 4 months ago. Horse was sold for around £700 inc all tack and rugs because it would not pass a 5 stage vetting. This was stated in the advert. Reason being that she was only 99% sound. The horse had been in full work, xc rides, she had lessons on it, done some SJ'ing and in hand showing with the horse and generally was a fun allrounder.
Horse was sold, tried by purchaser ( who had read the advert) and was told why the horse was cheap and that the owner did not know why the horse was not 100% but was happy and managed.
The pruchaser bought the horse and did not have horse vetted although the original owner did say that they were welcome to have her vetter but she would not pass on the flexion test. Purchaser also had 'advisors' with her.
After a week in the new home the horse went VERY lame, horse had not ever been VERY lame in previous home. Purchaser got the vet who advised her to poultice horse. Purchaser did this and horse came sound.
Orginial owner said that if horse was no better after 2 weeks then she would take the horse back, the horse got better and the new purchaser cracked on with the horse.
Purchaser has since sent old owner vids, pics, emails stating how well horse was going, vids of horse jumping, out on xc fun rides ect and has been gushing about how well horse was going- all of this is on facebook as well.
Fast forward a few weeks, horse has gone lame again so new owner has vet. Vet states that the horse has an injury to its leg and now the new owner wants to send the horse back to the original owner. New owner is also stating to anyone who wants to listen that the reason the horse is lame is due to the original owner not looking after the horse properly, obviously, original owner is mortified at these statements as the horse was sold honestly.
any advice I can give her as I am at a loss.She is relaly upset about the whole situation IMO, the horse was sold as seen, was not vetted, the horse was cheap and it stated in the ad that the horse would not pass the vet therefore the original owner should not have to take back a horse that was sold as not 100% sound that is now very lame esp as there is plenty of evididnce that the horse was doing its job for the best part of 4 months after sale.
Horse was sold, tried by purchaser ( who had read the advert) and was told why the horse was cheap and that the owner did not know why the horse was not 100% but was happy and managed.
The pruchaser bought the horse and did not have horse vetted although the original owner did say that they were welcome to have her vetter but she would not pass on the flexion test. Purchaser also had 'advisors' with her.
After a week in the new home the horse went VERY lame, horse had not ever been VERY lame in previous home. Purchaser got the vet who advised her to poultice horse. Purchaser did this and horse came sound.
Orginial owner said that if horse was no better after 2 weeks then she would take the horse back, the horse got better and the new purchaser cracked on with the horse.
Purchaser has since sent old owner vids, pics, emails stating how well horse was going, vids of horse jumping, out on xc fun rides ect and has been gushing about how well horse was going- all of this is on facebook as well.
Fast forward a few weeks, horse has gone lame again so new owner has vet. Vet states that the horse has an injury to its leg and now the new owner wants to send the horse back to the original owner. New owner is also stating to anyone who wants to listen that the reason the horse is lame is due to the original owner not looking after the horse properly, obviously, original owner is mortified at these statements as the horse was sold honestly.
any advice I can give her as I am at a loss.She is relaly upset about the whole situation IMO, the horse was sold as seen, was not vetted, the horse was cheap and it stated in the ad that the horse would not pass the vet therefore the original owner should not have to take back a horse that was sold as not 100% sound that is now very lame esp as there is plenty of evididnce that the horse was doing its job for the best part of 4 months after sale.