doriangrey
Well-Known Member
To be fair though, horses tend to be much more aware of what other horses are doing around them, they notice the warning signs, and it's more likely that he wouldn't have ended up biting another horse. Just an oblivious human who was fixed on attacking his private places. Humans are so slow on the uptake...
Poor horse had probably been saying quite clearly that he was thinking of biting because it hurt, he meant it, he would, honestly, oh, if you won't listen... "CHOMP!".
This is why I think we probably need to avoid comparing what we do to what horses do to each other.
Exactly, because humans don't react like horses. Because humans don't ask a few times and then punch someone. A horse will - swish a tail, ears back, snake a head - before they kick, bite whatever a horse does to demonstrate its displeasure. Now, I think it's displeasure or it wouldn't follow through with aggression. Humans have words to diffuse a situation, horses have a language but it's not ours. I don't think we are so clever at learning 'equus' but horses are very clever at learning 'human'. Diverting bad behaviour imo is just that, a diversion. Does a horse divert aggression in the herd, yes in many ways by being submissive, or foal yapping, or ceasing its irritating behaviour that started it in the first place. Horses are not humans but they are sentient beings with many emotions, maybe they have bad days who knows? Not every horse who kicks, or bites has had a bad past. Jeez, maybe they have a headache or have PMT, or are just impatient individuals - who really knows? The thing is, is that they live in our world with all the advantages/disadvantages that allows and if a swift reminder (like a mare nipping a foal) keeps us safe and the horse from the meat man why is that regarded as being so wrong as to react as another horse might?Horses are capable of aggression, so are humans - we are not so different after all.