kerilli
Well-Known Member
Charlotte Dujardin's comment in H&H this week got me thinking... she is quoted as saying "It bucked so high that I landed headfirst on the school kickboards, fracturing my skull and bursting an eardrum."
I don't mind a rearer (within reason, if s/he is going absolutely vertical and/or over backwards, no thanks) but I really cannot stand buckers. I'm not talking about a sulky little pathetic flip of the bum, but real McCoy bucking, obv.
I realise this is a bit of an unfashionable opinion - most of my horsey mates say they'd much prefer to deal with a bucker. Maybe I'm just not that flipping sticky, but I've been bucked off a few times here and there, and done my right knee twice that way.

My other rationale is:
Most rearers have a good reason (other than high jinks) and I think I usually get a lot more warning that they're thinking about doing something, so I have time to react, attempt to distract them, defuse the moment, etc. I've only twice ever had a horse rear with no warning at all (one was a youngster, in shock at suddenly seeing a patch of different coloured mud at its feet!) and neither went over backwards, both came down again safely with me still in the plate. Luckily, maybe... I know, I know.
Whereas bucks usually come out of the blue, and can catch you totally unawares (don't I know it.)
Rearers, imho, tend to either have a bit of a mental problem (don't want to go forward for some reason - fear, discomfort, whatever) or, perhaps, a front end problem (front feet particularly.) That's where I'd start looking, anyway...
Bucking could be for all sorts of reasons, almost anything to do with the saddle, the back, the hind end, or anything else really. Or, just high jinks, of course. Much more difficult to get to the bottom of.
YMMV and all that...
Thoughts?
I don't mind a rearer (within reason, if s/he is going absolutely vertical and/or over backwards, no thanks) but I really cannot stand buckers. I'm not talking about a sulky little pathetic flip of the bum, but real McCoy bucking, obv.
I realise this is a bit of an unfashionable opinion - most of my horsey mates say they'd much prefer to deal with a bucker. Maybe I'm just not that flipping sticky, but I've been bucked off a few times here and there, and done my right knee twice that way.
My other rationale is:
Most rearers have a good reason (other than high jinks) and I think I usually get a lot more warning that they're thinking about doing something, so I have time to react, attempt to distract them, defuse the moment, etc. I've only twice ever had a horse rear with no warning at all (one was a youngster, in shock at suddenly seeing a patch of different coloured mud at its feet!) and neither went over backwards, both came down again safely with me still in the plate. Luckily, maybe... I know, I know.
Whereas bucks usually come out of the blue, and can catch you totally unawares (don't I know it.)
Rearers, imho, tend to either have a bit of a mental problem (don't want to go forward for some reason - fear, discomfort, whatever) or, perhaps, a front end problem (front feet particularly.) That's where I'd start looking, anyway...
Bucking could be for all sorts of reasons, almost anything to do with the saddle, the back, the hind end, or anything else really. Or, just high jinks, of course. Much more difficult to get to the bottom of.
YMMV and all that...
Thoughts?