Respectful suggestion

I think the situation is a little different with breasts though isn't it? Wearing a low cut top isn't quite the same as wandering about with one's dick hanging out of the front of one's trousers.
 
I would have the good manners not to comment on the size of it though. How on earth you can claim to be interested in serious debate when you make comments like that is beyond me.
Click to expand...

let Claire's stoical politeness when confronted by signature-genitalia be a lesson to us all!
 
Are you being just a little bit prim? The girl in question wasn't very nice to me but, being a gentleman, I politely pointed out what a nice pair of tits she had.
 
You are always rambling on about how you are here for the serious debate in the face of pro-hunter's impoliteness yada yada yada, and yet your posting regarding a lady's breasts is ungentlemanly bordering on rude.

I'm sorry you believe me prim, but some of us were brought up, not dragged up.
 
What a lot it says about you that you get so offended by my pointing out what large baps a girl has, when you're silent about her calling me a "retard"?

I personally wasn't offended by this because it's part of the rough and tumble of the hunting forum.

As for "grown-up debate", if your idea of this is telling hunters not to talk about the illegal hunting they do, accompanied by a picture with the caption "walls have ears", then I'm happy to reside on my childish side of the fence.
 
I didn't see that comment - I don't obsessively read this forum because it is so dull, but I'm not impressed by anyone resorting to such language.

You really are obsessed by that comment aren't you? I have explained the context of that comment on another forum on numerous occasions and I am not going to repeat myself for the 55th time. If you wish to read more into it than I intended, then that is your prerogative.

That is rather rich, given that it is you that is always banging on about having a grown up debate? Which is it to be? A serious debate? Or you bringing up the size of someone's breasts and irrelevant cross postings from other forums.
 
Yeap he is obsessed by that comment, the letter from Simon Hart, by chernobyl and flushing out.

He can't argue about one thing without bringing up another.

Truly tedious and pathetic.
 
You seem to have had a complete sense of humour bypass. Saying that a poster has impressive breasts is hardly the most unpleasant thing one can say someone (even a woman), yet you react as if I've committed some terrible crime.

You call yourself combat_claire. It wouldn't take a lot to stop you in battle, would it? "Claire, your new haircut looks terrible!"

Chill out and stop being acting like Ann Widdecombe.
 
"If that's you in the photo, Rosie, can I suggest you get a suitably-sized sports bra for any outdoor activities and, in the meantime, refrain from any jogging"

Zig - where exactly in the above comment do you say "impressive breasts"?

Have to say old boy, cant see it

Anyway folks. boobs, willies, haircuts.....jeez, can we now move on!
 
All I am saying is that for someone that keeps banging on about people being polite to one another on here, you are a complete hypocrite to then make comment about the size of someone's breasts. Objecting to such a tactic has got little or nothing to do with my sense of humour.

Fear not, I can assure you that what my hair looked like underneath a kevlar helmet really was the least of my worries.
 
I was going to say you sound like one of the biddies from the Women's Institute who make jams, But of course you would never be a member of such an organisation: "Those nude calendars! SO disgusting!!!"
 
Fantastic post ZigZagZig! You so neatly expose the shrill hypocrisy of the pro hunt establishment.
 
I was going to say you sound like one of the biddies from the Women's Institute who make jams, But of course you would never be a member of such an organisation: "Those nude calendars! SO disgusting!!!"
Click to expand...

And you look like you know a lot about "jams" zig is that why the pic (avitar)of you has gone on a"diet" are we.? and what size bra would fit you then?
 
zig, have you been two timed a lot or been unable to have a relationship?
You seem to spend a lot of time picking on girls... Seems as if you have a few issues there...

And as for you Bunce, all you seem to be doing is hiding behind Zig cheering. In fact, reading your posts you seem to have an unhealthy obsession with him.....I would watch out there Zig....back against the wall matey.. you might not want him standing behind you..
 
Bunce, do you also admit that Zigzagzig demonstrates the most staggering hypocrisy by constantly exhorting the pro-hunting posters to be polite, while displaying the most poor manners himself?
 
I am not sure but reading this thread - is this a case of 'Trolls' ?!?

Quote:
Dear forum users

I am aware that the forum has been experiencing some problems with trolls recently. If forum users respond to posts which have been posted by a troll, then they are encouraging the troll to continue posting. The best way to clear the forum of trolls is to not respond to their posts and place them on user ignore. If they do not get any response then they will soon get bored and leave. Anyone who is offensive towards a troll risks having action taken against their account so to prevent this and ensure forum harmony DO NOT FEED THE TROLL!

Thank you

HHO Admin
 
I'd like someone to clarify what a troll is! I've always thought it to be someone who posts on internet forums claiming to be on the fence, can see both sides of the debate but through their posting it soon becomes clear that they are leaning towards the dark side!! I think 'ugly dog' may qualify as one.

As for the rest of Scratchy and Co they have clearly indicated through their posts that they are definatly anti hunt, which in my eyes doesn't make them trolls, although I'd like to know if their beliefs are limited to posting on internet forums, or do they take a more active role, fight the cause and all of that.

As for not feeding them, I have to disagree. It would be a sorry old world if we all stopped talking to people who held different views to us. If you dont like what they have to say then why not stand your ground and fight your corner. If someone is being particually pathetic with their comments then a reasoned reply will show them up for what they are.
 
I always believed an internet troll was someone that deliberately made controversial statements in an attempt to stir up comments and reaction from regular forum users.

Comments might have been along the lines of 'those who go hunting are evil child molesting scum' designed purely to get an angry response and wind people up.

In which case none of the current users of this forum really fall into that category.
 
if hunting anoys you so much then why are you on here ???

in case you hadnt noticed it is the bloody horse and hound forum D'oh.
Click to expand...

So with you there kickandshout. Have only been on this forum for a few days and sick and tired of ZIGZAGs attitude. All they seem to want to do is cause arguements and piss everyvbody off, it's really qeiute childish and tedious! So you don't like hunting ...go and bang your drum elsewhere! :(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top