RSPCA STatement - Amersham Animals To Stay Put For Time Being

EquineOnline

Well-Known Member
Joined
29 October 2006
Messages
84
Location
UK
www.equineonline.net
A hearing to decide the immediate fate of 29 donkeys and Shetland ponies owned by the Gray family has today resulted in the animals remaining in the care of the RSPCA and other welfare organisations.

Deputy District Judge Sandeep Kainth, at Oxford Magistrates Court, suspended the original order for the 11 donkeys and 18 ponies to be returned to the family in light of representation by the RSPCA. The case will now go to the High Court and will be subject to a judicial review.

A legal application was made on Friday 14 April by James Gray of Spindle Farm, Hyde Heath, Amersham, Buckinghamshire for the RSPCA to immediately return 29 animals that they and other welfare charities have been caring for since police seized them in January 2008.

The application was made by James Gray after Deputy District Judge Kainth ordered that 11 donkeys and 18 ponies be returned to him by the RSPCA, at a hearing in Oxford Magistrates Court on Friday 4 April.

For the RSPCA, Phillip Havers, QC, today said that to enforce the previous order to return the animals would be deciding the outcome of a judicial review before it happened.

He also said that there would be a risk of suffering to the donkeys and ponies if they were returned as donkeys were among the dead animals removed in January. Also, prosecution vet Robert Baskerville found that one of the donkeys was “considered to be at risk of death within hours or days unless it received urgent specialist treatment.”

“We are, of course, delighted that the animals will remain in the care of the animal welfare charities for the immediate future and hope we will be able to secure their long-term well-being,” said the RSPCA’s Chief Officer Tim Wass.

“We have very real concerns for the welfare of the donkeys, ponies and horses involved, which is why we are asking the Deputy District Judge to explain the original decision.”

Mr Justice Wyn Williams, at the High Court on Friday 14 April, referred the matter back to Oxford Magistrates Court, stating that: “by far the most appropriate person to enforce the order is the person who made the order”.
-ends-

Notes to editors

The court order for the return of the 29 donkeys and ponies, along with the sale at auction of 82 other horses, was made by Deputy District Judge Kainth following an application by the Gray family for their return, under Section 20 of the Animal Welfare Act 2006. The RSPCA contested this application, and had argued that they should be allowed instead to oversee the rehoming of the animals in order to safeguard their future welfare.

The animals will remain where they are until the outcome of the judicial review is decided.

The pre-trial review for the RSPCA’s criminal case against James John Gray, Julie Gray, Cordelia Gray and Jodie Gray * along with a 15 year old male * will be heard on 28 April 2008 at Oxford Magistrates Court. They face 12 charges related to section 4 and section 9 of the Animal Welfare Act 2006 and cover causing unnecessary suffering to and failing to meet the welfare needs of a total of 125 horses, ponies and donkeys, removed from Spindle Farm between 4 and 12 January 2008.

 
[ QUOTE ]


The animals will remain where they are until the outcome of the judicial review is decided.




[/ QUOTE ]

guessing they dont go to auction? And stay where they are? Or does this not apply? I dunno
crazy.gif
 
It says in the statement the case will go to the High Court for a judicial review. Is this separate to the Grays hearing on 28 April because it also says in the statement that this is still going ahead, so what will the High Court hearing be about?
 
A very big well done to all fighting for these horses
without putting a damp squib on matters we have won the battle not the war - there is still a risk some animals may have to be returned and so impetus must not be lost - very important to keep this case high profile in the press
 
Can anyone tell me who the solicitors are who are acting for Mr Gray - professional interest, I'm afraid and I don't think they've been mentioned, or not on anything I've seen. I see the RSPCA have Philip Havers QC on board, who is very good indeed and despite only ever having him on the opposite side to me, I have a great deal of respect for him. He is very persuasive and knows what he's doing, so good choice there.
 
Hi Cariad

As you are in the game do you not have access to that kind of info? I would imagine you can find out more than we can :-).

Not that we're discussing it of course, not wanting to jeorardise the case...
 
[ QUOTE ]
Can anyone tell me who the solicitors are who are acting for Mr Gray - professional interest, I'm afraid and I don't think they've been mentioned, or not on anything I've seen. I see the RSPCA have Philip Havers QC on board, who is very good indeed and despite only ever having him on the opposite side to me, I have a great deal of respect for him. He is very persuasive and knows what he's doing, so good choice there.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't know the name - only that he was memorable for the fact that he was (IMO) mostly grasping at straws, floundering and 'gabbling'!!! Who knows, there is a chance that JG might sack them and get another lot to act for him. As it is, Judge Snaith ordered that JG should pay £3,000 costs for todays hearing!!
wink.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
hmmmm My Jack appears very quiet this evening lol

[/ QUOTE ]
shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
wink.gif


[/ QUOTE ]

Not so quiet if you look around..

shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
tongue.gif
 
Yes, that'll be the barrister. I was after the solicitors. I probably can find out, but I wasn't in the office yesterday and just easier to ask on here. Laziness, really.
 
I am sure, as others have said, being in that "circle" you would have access to a lot more information than the general public would!!! I really dont see the point of asking "joe public" when you would easily be able to glean that info from "inner circles"
 
[ QUOTE ]
Can anyone tell me who the solicitors are who are acting for Mr Gray - professional interest, I'm afraid and I don't think they've been mentioned, or not on anything I've seen.

[/ QUOTE ]

Blyth Liggins, the only frim of 'specialist equine lawyers' that is so short of work that they have to advertise in Horse and Hound for it. I bet they are getting the rough edge of JG's tongue now that he has to paty £3000 costs for yesterday's little venture! <ROFL>
 
All i can say is this,if people doubt RSPCA then dont doubt their Witness BOB BASKERVILLE.he is a top vet and he would never be on RSPCA's side unless he thought the animals had been neglected,I know him personally since he put my horse down last summer and he has been my vet since 1992 ! You cant find a more honest Vet ! So knowing that he is on their side have put the whole case in a different prospective in my eyes
And who really gives a toss who J.G's solicitor is ? The main thing is that the RSPCA is able to appeal the decision.
I know that J.G is not known for being able to think unless he can use his fists,but his barrister Mr P Williams must have a brain cell or to so why doesn't he advice J.G to sign them over to RSPCA to get it over and done with.
He doesn't need the money so he should just cut his losses and get on with it,and start a new job that does not have anything to do with animals
 
Sorry didn't mean it to come out like that. It's just that the papers used to report who was involved and then they figured that it was free advertising so now you just usually get the barrister's name. I was just curious.
 
Top