Seat savers

Boulty

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 April 2011
Messages
2,296
Visit site
Hi my saddle & my arse are not getting along when I have to sit in it for more than a couple of hours (it’s a Stubben… need I say more?).

Have decided I’m buying my arse a seat saver but looking for opinions on which is best for comfort if spending 3 or 4 hrs in the saddle mainly in walk.

Debating the HM one as I liked my Flexee when I had one but not sure what kind of feel the seat saver will give / if it would be too bulky?

Also thinking about the acavello gel ones which I guess would cope better if it got wet (or would it just make it really slippery?) but worried it may not be padded enough.

Or any other thoughts on other brands & styles?
 

tda

Well-Known Member
Joined
18 April 2013
Messages
4,592
Location
Yorkshire
Visit site
I actually got an acavello gel out for the stickiness, not because my saddle is uncomfortable, but I actually don't like it, I realised I like to be able to move about a bit, and when you get on if not completely centred it's awkward to try and move!
Just remembered I have a HM one too that I got 2nd hand when they were popular but i have never used it
 

meleeka

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 September 2001
Messages
11,580
Location
Hants, England
Visit site
I have a Acavello one and an HM one. I prefer the Acavello one. I have the gel out, but if just for comfort the gel in one would be perfect. The HM one is very thick and can make you feel perched on the saddle, but your seat bones won’t hurt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tda

sbloom

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 September 2011
Messages
11,126
Location
Suffolk
www.stephaniebloomsaddlefitter.co.uk
Seat savers can help but ultimately it's usually that the seat shape doesn't suit your pelvis, something we don't take into account enough. Actually fitting your pelvis offers so much more benefit it's worth considering a saddle that suits you better. Stubbens tend to have narrowish seats, that may be the problem (seatbones hanging off too near or at the welting) but it could be anything

Acavallo - gel out is too sticky to allow for good aiding and mobility in the seat, gel in can mark the seat of the saddle.

You could try something like Thinline and then experiment with padding underneath it so changing the shape of the seat to better suit you. The Thinline is good for impact on your back, less good for major cushioning, used as is.
 

Fransurrey

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 April 2004
Messages
7,070
Location
Surrey
Visit site
Is it worth considering a HM hip saver to soften the sharpness of the seat? I use one because of coccyx issues, but it also moulds to my bottom and tailors the twist to my pelvis. I'm not sure Acavallo would help in your instance, as they're uniform in their thickness. When first put on the saddle it feels like perching on a brick, but even in winter it soon softens and becomes like a comfy armchair.
 

Boulty

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 April 2011
Messages
2,296
Visit site
I am aware a new saddle would be the ideal but not financially possible to afford what I think I’d want atm (maybe at some point in next few years…).

Think I’m just going to have to see if I can order / try a few different ones and see what I can make work. Interesting idea re a hip saver being less bulky than a full seat saver
 

Jambarissa

Well-Known Member
Joined
20 December 2014
Messages
1,003
Visit site
My favourite is the HM but it does tend to tip you forward.

I replaced it with an acavallo gel out and it was nowhere near as comfy but I persevered and do quite like it now. Looks shabby quickly though and is forever covered in hairs. I guess the gel in would be better for those issues.

I've also got a lovely thick sheepskin one, i wanted to put a thin layer of memory foam under it to emulate the HM but have never got round to it.
 

Jambarissa

Well-Known Member
Joined
20 December 2014
Messages
1,003
Visit site
I wasn't aware that the hip saver was different to the seat saver, mines a 20 year old seat saver, may have to look at a hip saver now 😊
 

Caski

Well-Known Member
Joined
30 March 2020
Messages
132
Visit site
I am aware a new saddle would be the ideal but not financially possible to afford what I think I’d want atm (maybe at some point in next few years…).

Think I’m just going to have to see if I can order / try a few different ones and see what I can make work. Interesting idea re a hip saver being less bulky than a full seat saver
I have an HM brown one if you would like it?
 

MuddyMonster

Well-Known Member
Joined
22 September 2015
Messages
5,543
Visit site
I use the Shires supafleece one.

It's super comfortable - the longest adventure done is about 8 hours in it.

It's about £25 so super reasonable too.
 

vhf

Well-Known Member
Joined
30 May 2007
Messages
1,496
Location
Cornwall
Visit site
I recently acquired the gel out one. Mostly to try and help with chronic pain, but accepting that the pain/associated weakness has made me feel very insecure in the saddle on an OTTB! It's a second hand one and so isn't really sticky any more and not a hair magnet - I can move freely in the saddle but feel both more comfortable and more secure because I can sit into it. I resisted for years because I was sure I'd feel stuck/perched/etc. after previous experiences on other people's set-ups. But it's worked for me, for now at least. If it stops I've not wasted a lot of money and I can resell.
 

Birker2020

Well-Known Member
Joined
18 January 2021
Messages
10,549
Location
West Mids
Visit site
Hi my saddle & my arse are not getting along when I have to sit in it for more than a couple of hours (it’s a Stubben… need I say more?).

Have decided I’m buying my arse a seat saver but looking for opinions on which is best for comfort if spending 3 or 4 hrs in the saddle mainly in walk.

Debating the HM one as I liked my Flexee when I had one but not sure what kind of feel the seat saver will give / if it would be too bulky?

Also thinking about the acavello gel ones which I guess would cope better if it got wet (or would it just make it really slippery?) but worried it may not be padded enough.

Or any other thoughts on other brands & styles?
Acavallo - very comfortable for long hacks. I wore a hole in mine due to my weird back and the movement I make in the saddle when riding due to my back but it lasted a long time.

1692707101823.png
 

Fransurrey

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 April 2004
Messages
7,070
Location
Surrey
Visit site
I am aware a new saddle would be the ideal but not financially possible to afford what I think I’d want atm (maybe at some point in next few years…).

Think I’m just going to have to see if I can order / try a few different ones and see what I can make work. Interesting idea re a hip saver being less bulky than a full seat saver
I think you misunderstand me. It's not less bulky, just more malleable.
 

Wheresthehoofpick

Well-Known Member
Joined
16 October 2018
Messages
431
Visit site
I always go on these threads and talk about vaginal atrophy and the menopause. I also have back issues. Total wreck!

However…. I am the self entitled queen of the seat saver.

HM - you have to let them warm up. They are grim when you first sit
on them. Mine sat unused for months until I worked this out. You have to have enough saddle seat to sit them in as they are bulky and you can end up hardly in the saddle.

Acavello - gel out. Hated the stickiness.

Acavello- gel in. I have the different relief options and the extra thick. These really helped.

shires supa fleece. - good but then upgraded to proper sheepskin.

Le Mieux sheepskin. - I really like these for very long rides. Warm in winter, cool in summer. Rubbish if it rains before you get on.

Ultimately I ended up with HRT and a new saddle for one horse. Can’t afford a second new one. I still use sheepskin every day and the gel out if I am feeling sore.

I bought all of mine second hand via FB and ebay. People sell them all the time.
 

poiuytrewq

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 April 2008
Messages
19,330
Location
Cotswolds
Visit site
I don’t use one anymore but I did but the gel
In for my previous saddle and was worried about the gel marking the seat. I cut a bit of think cotton, I think it was from a pillow case! And put it between the saddle and seat saver. It stayed in place and didn’t mark the saddle at all.
I also have a HM and I think whilst someone above has mentioned them being a bit stiff and bulky once broken in that are really comfortable.
 

Tiddlypom

Carries on creakily
Joined
17 July 2013
Messages
23,896
Location
In between the Midlands and the North
Visit site
I loved my HM, had one from when they were first brought out. They are bulky, but didn't feel bulky to sit on IYSWIM.

They don't stick you to the saddle like the modern seat savers do, I hate sticky bum breeches for the same reason. I like to be able to move.

The late chestnut git would certainly have upped his strike rate of dumping me once a year if I hadn't had a HM seat saver on his saddle, though 🤣.
 

splashgirl45

Lurcher lover
Joined
6 March 2010
Messages
16,099
Location
suffolk
Visit site
I am aware a new saddle would be the ideal but not financially possible to afford what I think I’d want atm (maybe at some point in next few years…).

Think I’m just going to have to see if I can order / try a few different ones and see what I can make work. Interesting idea re a hip saver being less bulky than a full seat saver


Have sent you a PM today
 

sbloom

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 September 2011
Messages
11,126
Location
Suffolk
www.stephaniebloomsaddlefitter.co.uk
My favourite is the HM but it does tend to tip you forward.

They'd be more prone to tipping people backmof they didn't suit as they can make the twist wider. It may be you're compensating for that, or the cantle shape (high or starting too far under your set) combines with the extra bulk to tip you forwards.

I wasn't aware that the hip saver was different to the seat saver, mines a 20 year old seat saver, may have to look at a hip saver now 😊

Not to my knowledge. There are special ones for treeless saddles. Mine would not fit most treeless, as it's the same cut as the normal HM seat saver, just more 3-dimensional.

They're for different purposes, they do make more of a pronounced twist on a saddle, sort of narrower, whereas the seat saver if anything makes it wider. We all need different shapes underneath us to support us correctly.
 
Top