silvershadow81
Well-Known Member
I was invited to join a lady go watch her compete at a prix St. George class over the weekend and I was amazed how unfair the whole system was!
It appears that in order to get top marks, you need to be trained by an associate of the judge, have the biggest horsebox possible and really just be somebody!
I think this is hugely unfair to other riders who are more talented than these richer riders as it costs lots of money and they invest the same time in getting to this level in the first place!!!
It was so obvious that the foreign judge, who did not have any pre-conceptions about any of the riders, was able to mark based on performance, which is obviously how things SHOULD be done YET the British judges marked with scores some of which were 100 marks HIGHER!!
I am far from a dressage rider, but i could see the 'somebody' riders doing their transitions way off the markers, as it was easier for their horses as it kept them balances, yet they were not marked down??
I had never been to a BD show before, but it was extremely disappointing to learn first hand that this sport is so incest dominated! How can riders be encouraged to enter a discipline which is so tightly closed to others who dont have the money in place to get IN with this lot?
I used to groom for an international show jumper and found even the largest of BSJA shows to be really friendly, I know Dressage is based entirely on performance and looks IN the arena, but I defiantly think this stigma has sadly transferred to beyond the arena.
It has most defiantly put me off the idea of ever taking up this discipline!
I really hope this was a one-off situation which was my first experience, but I doubt this isnt normal practice? Would love to find out if this was just a one-off? Or does this sort of thing go on a lot???
And I thought the Eurovision Song Contest was a fix!!
It appears that in order to get top marks, you need to be trained by an associate of the judge, have the biggest horsebox possible and really just be somebody!
I think this is hugely unfair to other riders who are more talented than these richer riders as it costs lots of money and they invest the same time in getting to this level in the first place!!!
It was so obvious that the foreign judge, who did not have any pre-conceptions about any of the riders, was able to mark based on performance, which is obviously how things SHOULD be done YET the British judges marked with scores some of which were 100 marks HIGHER!!
I am far from a dressage rider, but i could see the 'somebody' riders doing their transitions way off the markers, as it was easier for their horses as it kept them balances, yet they were not marked down??
I had never been to a BD show before, but it was extremely disappointing to learn first hand that this sport is so incest dominated! How can riders be encouraged to enter a discipline which is so tightly closed to others who dont have the money in place to get IN with this lot?
I used to groom for an international show jumper and found even the largest of BSJA shows to be really friendly, I know Dressage is based entirely on performance and looks IN the arena, but I defiantly think this stigma has sadly transferred to beyond the arena.
It has most defiantly put me off the idea of ever taking up this discipline!
I really hope this was a one-off situation which was my first experience, but I doubt this isnt normal practice? Would love to find out if this was just a one-off? Or does this sort of thing go on a lot???
And I thought the Eurovision Song Contest was a fix!!