Shocking! And this from the guy who opposes rollkur

Guys, i really don't think this is any thing like a roll-kur issue


Having ridden a few fresians, they tend to get very very short in the neck, (by virtue of conformation) and like to curl their noses in - it can be very tricky to persuade them to take your hand forward into the bridle, in front of the verticle.

And with a horse that has this tendency, simply throwing away the rein in an attempt to get their nose out, never encourages the horse to accept and understand the contact, as every time they tuck their head in, you 'reward' that tendancy by giving away the rein...

...So the only way to gently counter this tendency is with a steady hand, with enough positive pressure on the rein to show the horse how you need the contact to be, but vitally a forward-thinking hand so that whenever the horse does take his nose forward into the contact, you can reward and encourage by pushing your hand forward.

Plenty of these photos seem to show exactly this process

Does this make sense folks? I hope we aren't going to demonise Dr Heuschmann, who has been a wonderful proponent of sympathetic training - there are other riders out there who frankly deserve the vitriol, but not in this case i believe.
 
Does this make sense folks? I hope we aren't going to demonise Dr Heuschmann, who has been a wonderful proponent of sympathetic training - there are other riders out there who frankly deserve the vitriol, but not in this case i believe.

How do we decide who to condemn? If a photo is sufficient to condemn one person, why isn't it sufficient to condemn another? If a reasonable explanation of the horse's way of going is enough to account for one training method, why isn't it enough for another? Why do Anky's words about sympathetic training not count for as much as Dr H's? How do we decide who deserves the vitriol (if we absolutely insist on chucking poisonous substances around!)?
 
Top