Sixteen Hands
Well-Known Member
Apologies, please ignore the previous thread and poll on this subject as the question was misleading given the thread title. Embarrassing, I know, however I do believe that it is an important subject that needs discussion and therefore Ive started a new thread after various suggestions to do so. As they say, many thanks for your patience and understanding!
I Originally put the poll in this section so that it doesn't get lost too quickly and hopefully gets maximum responses.
At the cross-country phase of the Blenheim Palace International Horse Trials a loose dog ran from the crowd as a competitor, having jumped fence 14 was coming around the corner to approach fence 15 the first water complex.
It caused the horse to swerve and continued chasing it as it approached the fence. The horse and rider got through the complex, but then the dog continued chasing the horse through the water. Clearly the rider and horse were aware of the presence of the dog. Attempting fence 16 the horse had a run out. A member of the public wrestled the dog to the ground and put a makeshift lead around its neck with what looked like his trouser belt.
Later in the afternoon, there was a call over the tannoy system for the owners to reclaim a lost dog which had made its way to one of the catering outlets.
I also saw later in the afternoon some dog events in one of the smaller arenas where all the dogs were under control.
The majority of dogs at the event were under control and well-behaved.
But is it fair to the competitors, many of which are at international level, that they may be disadvantaged by a loose dog, which may not only alter their position but ultimately affect the safety of the horse and rider?
Dogs weren't allowed at the Olympics. Spectators had the choice to attend with their dogs or not. Riders competed with the same chance and spectators seemed very happy.
It really is an open question. Should dogs be banned at major events?
Over to you!
I Originally put the poll in this section so that it doesn't get lost too quickly and hopefully gets maximum responses.
At the cross-country phase of the Blenheim Palace International Horse Trials a loose dog ran from the crowd as a competitor, having jumped fence 14 was coming around the corner to approach fence 15 the first water complex.
It caused the horse to swerve and continued chasing it as it approached the fence. The horse and rider got through the complex, but then the dog continued chasing the horse through the water. Clearly the rider and horse were aware of the presence of the dog. Attempting fence 16 the horse had a run out. A member of the public wrestled the dog to the ground and put a makeshift lead around its neck with what looked like his trouser belt.
Later in the afternoon, there was a call over the tannoy system for the owners to reclaim a lost dog which had made its way to one of the catering outlets.
I also saw later in the afternoon some dog events in one of the smaller arenas where all the dogs were under control.
The majority of dogs at the event were under control and well-behaved.
But is it fair to the competitors, many of which are at international level, that they may be disadvantaged by a loose dog, which may not only alter their position but ultimately affect the safety of the horse and rider?
Dogs weren't allowed at the Olympics. Spectators had the choice to attend with their dogs or not. Riders competed with the same chance and spectators seemed very happy.
It really is an open question. Should dogs be banned at major events?
Over to you!