the watcher
Well-Known Member
I am giggling away here!
I probably have no right to comment here being as
1. I am no "show jumper"
2. I haven't read the whole thread.
3. I have drank too much pink wine,
4. I am no show jumper.
However the idea that "show jumpers" should have to leap in and defend their sport based on one persons opinion of one ad with 2 pictures is, to be frank laughable. Ridiculous.
This.
Except the bit about the wine.
It is a well bred horse in the ad that might one day make a competent showjumper. On a personal level the idea of it contesting 4 yo classes fills me with misgivings but I wouldn't want to see any 4 yo in any discipline that is still growing being pushed to that level. Is it expensive? Well yes, just broken and no idea of how it might perform in the future, that is a lot of money. Is it behind the bridle? Yup, and I wouldn't have chosen that picture to sell the horse.
Is it representative of all showjumpers? No. there are good ones and not so good ones and my experience is that there may be more 'not so good ones' in this particular discipline, however you can't judge an entire sport by one example.